Literature DB >> 20011340

Muscle transposition: does it still have a role?

Susan M Cera1, Steven D Wexner.   

Abstract

Since the early 1900s, skeletal muscle transpositions have been employed for complicated cases of fecal incontinence to augment or replace the anal sphincter. Multiple techniques have evolved that vary with the type and configuration of muscle used in the reconstruction. Transposition of the gluteus maximus muscle was popular in the early stages of development but was replaced by techniques involving transposition of the gracilis muscle. Within the past 16 years, electrical stimulators have been applied to the transposed muscle flaps to create a dynamic reconstruction improving the efficacy of these neosphincters over their static counterparts. However, the stimulated versions are technically demanding with a high rate of morbidity secondary to complications of the multiple components and variations in technique. The stimulator used in this procedure has been removed from the US market, although it is still available in other countries. Currently in the United States, gracilis transposition is still employed in the absence of an electrical stimulator as an adjunct to the artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter, American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN), such as in cases of severe muscle loss and congenital atresia. In European countries, the stimulated graciloplasty continues to evolve, leading to expansion of its use in total anorectal reconstruction for anal atresia and after abdominoperineal resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal incontinence; gluteoplasty; graciloplasty; muscle transposition; neosphincter construction

Year:  2005        PMID: 20011340      PMCID: PMC2780125          DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  39 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  C G Baeten; H R Bailey; A Bakka; P Belliveau; E Berg; W D Buie; M J Burnstein; J Christiansen; J A Coller; S Galandiuk; L J LaFontaine; J Lange; R D Madoff; K E Matzel; L Påhlman; R Parc; J C Reilly; M Seccia; A G Thorson; A M Vernava; S Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Rectal augmentation and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter: a new approach in the management of fecal urgency and incontinence.

Authors:  N S Williams; O A Ogunbiyi; S M Scott; O Fajobi; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A E Chapman; B Geerdes; P Hewett; J Young; T Eyers; G Kiroff; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Comparison of epineural or intramuscular nerve electrodes for stimulated graciloplasty.

Authors:  J Konsten; M J Rongen; O A Ogunbiyi; A Darakhshan; C G Baeten; N S Williams
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction.

Authors:  E Rullier; F Zerbib; C Laurent; M Caudry; J Saric
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome.

Authors:  K E Matzel; R D Madoff; L J LaFontaine; C G Baeten; W D Buie; J Christiansen; S Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Prospective study of artificial anal sphincter and dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence.

Authors:  H Ortiz; P Armendariz; M DeMiguel; A Solana; R Alós; J V Roig
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; Cor Baeten; Randolph Bailey; Arne Bakka; Bruce Belin; Paul Belliveau; Eugen Berg; W Donald Buie; Marcus Burnstein; John Christiansen; John Coller; Susan Galandiuk; J Lange; Robert Madoff; Klaus E Matzel; Lars Påhlman; Rolland Parc; John Reilly; Massimo Seccia; Alan G Thorson; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Augmented unilateral gluteoplasty with fascia lata graft in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Farid; H A Moneim; T Mahdy; W Omar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  W Douglas Wong; Susan M Congliosi; Michael P Spencer; Marvin L Corman; Patrick Tan; Frank G Opelka; Marcus Burnstein; Juan J Nogueras; H Randolph Bailey; Jose Manuel Devesa; Robert D Fry; Burt Cagir; Elisa Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Mallory A Lawrence; W Donald Buie; John Heine; Peter S Edelstein; Sharon Gregorcyk; Paul Antoine Lehur; Francis Michot; P Terry Phang; David J Schoetz; Fabio Potenti; Josephine Y Tsai
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinical Challenges of Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hadie Razjouyan; Shanti Prasad; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09

3.  Two different gracilis loops in graciloplasty of congenital fecal incontinence: comparison of the therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Gang-Gang Shi; Hui Wang; Li Wang; Zuo-Xing Zhang; Hao Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  J D Puerta Díaz; R Castaño Llano; L J Lombana; J I Restrepo; G Gómez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Karim Alavi; Sook Chan; Paul Wise; Andreas M Kaiser; Ranjan Sudan; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The antegrade continence enema procedure and total anorectal reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew P Zbar
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-12

7.  The use of a simple anal sling in the management of anal incontinence.

Authors:  José Manuel Devesa; Rosana Vicente
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-17

8.  Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Michal Romaniszyn; Benita Siarkiewicz; Dorota Zelazny
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Management of fourth degree obstetric perineal tear without colostomy using non - stimulated gracilis - our experience over eleven years.

Authors:  Jiten Kulkarni; Anuradha J Patil; Bhaskar Musande; Abhishek B Bhamare
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

10.  Autologous Myoblasts for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-controlled Study (MIAS).

Authors:  Olivier Boyer; Valérie Bridoux; Camille Giverne; Aurélie Bisson; Edith Koning; Anne-Marie Leroi; Pascal Chambon; Justine Déhayes; Stephanie Le Corre; Serge Jacquot; Dominique Bastit; Jérémie Martinet; Estelle Houivet; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Jacques Benichou; Francis Michot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.