Literature DB >> 16096762

Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Christophe Müller1, Orlin Belyaev, Thomas Deska, Ansgar Chromik, Dirk Weyhe, Waldemar Uhl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the last resort for patients suffering from severe fecal incontinence. The armamentarium of surgical options for this condition has increased impressively during the last decade. Nevertheless, this fact seems to make neither patients nor surgeons feel more comfortable. Treatment of fecal incontinence still remains a challenge to modern medicine due to many specific sides of this problem. AIMS: This article gives an up-to-date overview of existing operative treatment options.
METHODS: An unbiased review of relevant literature was performed to assess the role of all methods of surgical treatment for fecal incontinence available nowadays.
RESULTS: Recent studies have shown poor late results after primary sphincter repair and low predictive value for most preoperative diagnostic tests. New surgical options such as artificial devices and electrically stimulated muscle transpositions are doomed by low success rates and unacceptably frequent complications. That is why current attention has focused on non- or minimally invasive therapies such as sacral nerve stimulation and temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal. However, all these innovative techniques remain experimental till enough high-evidence data are gathered for their objective evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Careful and detailed preoperative assessment to exactly determine the etiology of incontinence and individual approach remain the cornerstones of surgical treatment of fecal incontinence nowadays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096762     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-005-0566-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  52 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A E Chapman; B Geerdes; P Hewett; J Young; T Eyers; G Kiroff; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence.

Authors:  E Ganio; A R Luc; G Clerico; M Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  German artificial sphincter system: first report of a novel and highly integrated sphincter prosthesis for therapy of major fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Hans-J Schrag; Federico Fragoza Padilla; Frank Goldschmidtböing; Alexander Doll; Peter Woias; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  N S Williams; J Patel; B D George; R I Hallan; E S Watkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; A Wald; N J Norton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema.

Authors:  P S Malone; P G Ransley; E M Kiely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Dynamic rectus abdominis muscle sphincter for stoma continence: an acute functional study in a dog model.

Authors:  J W Bardoel; W K Stadelmann; G A Perez-Abadia; S Galandiuk; E D Zonnevijlle; C Maldonado; R W Stremel; G R Tobin; M Kon; J H Barker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff; Susan C Parker; Madhulika G Varma; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Sacha M Koch; Ozenç Uludağ; Mart-Jan Rongen; Cor G Baeten; Wim van Gemert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  4 in total

1.  Office-based management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vanessa C Costilla; Amy E Foxx-Orenstein; Anita P Mayer; Michael D Crowell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

2.  Constipation in 44 patients implanted with an artificial bowel sphincter.

Authors:  Syrine Gallas; Anne-Marie Leroi; Valérie Bridoux; Benoît Lefebure; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Françis Michot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

Authors:  A Ommer; F A Wenger; T Rolfs; M K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The ProTect device in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  P Giamundo; D F Altomare; M Rinaldi; P De Nardi; V D'Onofrio; A Infantino; F Pucciani; G Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.