Literature DB >> 12783149

When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Nicola Bruno1, Paolo Bernardis.   

Abstract

Actors viewed horizontal segments either in isolation or embedded in patterns that produce spatial illusory effects (Kanizsa's compression illusion and the "dumbbell" version of the Müller-Lyer compression-expansion illusion). They were asked to reproduce the apparent horizontal extent of these segments by the amplitude of open- or closed-loop motor responses (after having positioned a finger on position A, choose a position B on the right of A such that apparent width = B-A). A touchmonitor was used to present the displays and to record movement amplitudes and times. In open-loop motor responses, displays were turned off as soon as actors raised their finger from position A. In closed-loop responses, displays could be viewed continuously during the actions. Four conditions were investigated: (1). open-loop responses starting from A at the right endpoint of the segment; (2). closed-loop responses from A at the right endpoint of the segment; (3). open-loop responses from A at the left endpoint of the segment; and (4). open-loop responses from A aligned horizontally with the left endpoint of the segment but displaced vertically below that segment. With both kinds of display, results in conditions (1). and (2). demonstrated illusory effects comparable to those measured in standard visual matching experiments, whereas results in conditions (3). and (4). showed essentially no illusory effects. Implications for models of visuomotor transformations in peripersonal space are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783149     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1440-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

Review 1.  Eye-hand coordination: eye to hand or hand to eye?

Authors:  D P Carey
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Shrinkage and expansion by amodal completion: a critical review.

Authors:  S Vezzani
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Authors:  Y Hu; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

Review 6.  Information about spatial location based on knowledge about efference.

Authors:  L Festinger; L K Canon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Different frames of reference for position and motion.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1994-01

9.  Saccadic programming and perceived location.

Authors:  E Wong; A Mack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08

10.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Paolo Bernardis; Paul Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.

Authors:  R Gilster; J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; C D Wiesner; R Ferstl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of Kanizsa's compression illusion on reflexive saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades.

Authors:  Paul C Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Petroc Sumner; Pei-Chun Tsai; Kenny Yu; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.