Literature DB >> 12775668

Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures.

F Gijbels1, G Sanderink, J Wyatt, J Van Dam, B Nowak, R Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare organ and effective radiation doses for collimated and non-collimated cephalometric radiographs made by a multipurpose extraoral radiation unit.
METHODS: Cephalometric exposures were made from a Rando head phantom representing an average man with the Cranex Tome multipurpose radiation unit. A collimator was fabricated from a 3-mm thick piece of lead. The collimator was designed so that structures relevant for orthodontic diagnosis were not shielded, whereas the thyroid gland and the major part of the skull were shielded. Absorbed organ doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The effective dose was calculated both with (E(sal)) and without (E) inclusion of the salivary glands.
RESULTS: Use of a wedge-shaped lead collimator yielded a reduction in field size of 55% and a reduction in E from 3.0 micro Sv to 1.6 micro Sv (47%) and in E(sal) from 3.7 micro Sv to 2.2 micro Sv (41%).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a wedge-shaped collimator should be advocated in all cases where depiction of the thyroid gland and the neurocranium is not required. The resulting reduction in effective dose using our collimator was 47% (41% when the salivary glands are included), which is of clinical importance, especially in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775668     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/33233723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  9 in total

1.  National reference doses for dental cephalometric radiography.

Authors:  J R Holroyd
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiation exposure to foetus and breasts from dental X-ray examinations: effect of lead shields.

Authors:  Anna Kelaranta; Marja Ekholm; Paula Toroi; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Utility of thyroid collars in cephalometric radiography.

Authors:  K P Sansare; V Khanna; F Karjodkar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Dose reduction in orthodontic lateral cephalography: dosimetric evaluation of a novel cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) and anatomical cranial collimation (ACC).

Authors:  R C Hoogeveen; D Rottke; P F van der Stelt; W E R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Validation of anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) in orthodontic lateral cephalography.

Authors:  R C Hoogeveen; P J Guicherit; S R Gopie; P F van der Stelt; W E R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose.

Authors:  Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Ana Maria Bolognese; Daniela Gamba Garib; Fabio Ribeiro Guedes; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'anna
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-04-04

8.  Anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) for lateral cephalometric radiography: a technical report.

Authors:  R C Hoogeveen; P F van der Stelt; W E R Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana R Durão; Pisha Pittayapat; Maria Ivete B Rockenbach; Raphael Olszewski; Suk Ng; Afonso P Ferreira; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.