Literature DB >> 12773832

Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA.

Yujing Shen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the severity level of acute inpatient care in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) using the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs) Grouper and compare severity levels in the six study sites with other Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
METHODS: Acute inpatient stays were generated based on bedsection movement information in VA Inpatient Medical SAS data sets from federal fiscal years 1997 and 1998. All nonacute bedsections were excluded. The APR-DRG Grouper generated APR-DRG and severity level for each acute inpatient stay using relevant VA data in a fixed format. Severity and length of stay (LOS) within each major APR-DRG (those accounting for at least 0.5% of all acute inpatient stays or days) were compared between study sites and other centers using z scores.
RESULTS: Of 315 APR-DRGs, 63 major groups accounted for more than two thirds of all stays and days of care in both years. The study sites were similar in average patient severity and LOS to other centers for most APR-DRGs. For those with significant differences, the six centers had shorter LOS and higher severity. The magnitude of differences was large in LOS and small in severity.
CONCLUSIONS: The study sites are generally representative of the overall VA acute inpatient stays. Some adjustments were needed to reflect that the six sites had relatively sicker patients and lower LOS in some of APR-DRGs when resource utilization estimations in the six sites were generalized to the entire VA system. The severity measure of the 3M APR-DRG Grouper can be adapted to the VA controlling for the complicated nature of VA inpatient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12773832     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000068423.39715.CE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia.

Authors:  Jason F Reynoso; Manish M Tiwari; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Accuracy of the all patient refined diagnosis related groups classification system in congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  Aimee S Parnell; Justine Shults; J William Gaynor; Mary B Leonard; Dingwei Dai; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Intraventricular thrombolysis in intracerebral hemorrhage requiring ventriculostomy: a decade-long real-world experience.

Authors:  Yogesh Moradiya; Santosh B Murthy; David E Newman-Toker; Daniel F Hanley; Wendy C Ziai
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Primary Angioplasty Versus Stenting for Endovascular Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Mark R Villwock; David J Padalino; Raghu Ramaswamy; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Treatment course and outcomes after revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease in adults.

Authors:  Amanda Kahn; Gurmeen Kaur; Laura Stein; Stanley Tuhrim; Mandip S Dhamoon
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Community Mental Health Center Integrated Care Outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca Wells; Bobbie Kite; Ellen Breckenridge; Tenaya Sunbury
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2018-12

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection: importance of appropriate initial antimicrobial treatment.

Authors:  Scott T Micek; Ann E Lloyd; David J Ritchie; Richard M Reichley; Victoria J Fraser; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Summary perioperative risk metrics within the electronic medical record predict patient-level cost variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Patrick B Schwartz; Glen E Leverson; James R Barrett; Taylor Aiken; Alexandra W Acher; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Rebecca M Minter; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Patient acuity rating: quantifying clinical judgment regarding inpatient stability.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Elizabeth Retzer; Elizabeth K Weidman; James Woodruff; Andrew M Davis; Bruce D Minsky; William Meadow; Terry L Vanden Hoek; David O Meltzer
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.960

10.  Carotid Artery Stenosis with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Stenting versus Angioplasty.

Authors:  Mark R Villwock; David J Padalino; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.