BACKGROUND: New resident work-hour restrictions are expected to result in further increases in the number of handoffs between inpatient care providers, a known risk factor for poor outcomes. Strategies for improving the accuracy and efficiency of provider sign-outs are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a judgment-based scale for conveying the risk of clinical deterioration. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Internal medicine clinicians and patients. MEASUREMENTS: The Patient Acuity Rating (PAR), a 7-point Likert score representing the likelihood of a patient experiencing a cardiac arrest or intensive care unit (ICU) transfer within the next 24 hours, was obtained from physicians and midlevel practitioners at the time of sign-out. Cross-covering physicians were blinded to the results, which were subsequently correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: Forty eligible clinicians consented to participate, providing 6034 individual scores on 3419 patient-days. Seventy-four patient-days resulted in cardiac arrest or ICU transfer within 24 hours. The average PAR was 3 ± 1 and yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82. Provider-specific AUROC values ranged from 0.69 for residents to 0.85 for attendings (P = 0.01). Interns and midlevels did not differ significantly from the other groups. A PAR of 4 or higher corresponded to a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 68% for predicting cardiac arrest or ICU transfer in the next 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical judgment regarding patient stability can be reliably quantified in a simple score with the potential for efficiently conveying complex assessments of at-risk patients during handoffs between healthcare members.
BACKGROUND: New resident work-hour restrictions are expected to result in further increases in the number of handoffs between inpatient care providers, a known risk factor for poor outcomes. Strategies for improving the accuracy and efficiency of provider sign-outs are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a judgment-based scale for conveying the risk of clinical deterioration. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Internal medicine clinicians and patients. MEASUREMENTS: The Patient Acuity Rating (PAR), a 7-point Likert score representing the likelihood of a patient experiencing a cardiac arrest or intensive care unit (ICU) transfer within the next 24 hours, was obtained from physicians and midlevel practitioners at the time of sign-out. Cross-covering physicians were blinded to the results, which were subsequently correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: Forty eligible clinicians consented to participate, providing 6034 individual scores on 3419 patient-days. Seventy-four patient-days resulted in cardiac arrest or ICU transfer within 24 hours. The average PAR was 3 ± 1 and yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82. Provider-specific AUROC values ranged from 0.69 for residents to 0.85 for attendings (P = 0.01). Interns and midlevels did not differ significantly from the other groups. A PAR of 4 or higher corresponded to a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 68% for predicting cardiac arrest or ICU transfer in the next 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical judgment regarding patient stability can be reliably quantified in a simple score with the potential for efficiently conveying complex assessments of at-risk patients during handoffs between healthcare members.
Authors: Timothy J Hodgetts; Gary Kenward; Ioannis G Vlachonikolis; Susan Payne; Nicolas Castle Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: W A Knaus; F E Harrell; J Lynn; L Goldman; R S Phillips; A F Connors; N V Dawson; W J Fulkerson; R M Califf; N Desbiens; P Layde; R K Oye; P E Bellamy; R B Hakim; D P Wagner Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Amber T Pincavage; Shana Ratner; Megan L Prochaska; Meryl Prochaska; Julie Oyler; Andrew M Davis; Vineet M Arora Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John T Ratelle; Diana J Kelm; Andrew J Halvorsen; Colin P West; Amy S Oxentenko Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Juan C Rojas; Patrick G Lyons; Teresa Jiang; Megha Kilaru; Leslie McCauley; Jamila Picart; Kyle A Carey; Dana P Edelson; Vineet M Arora; Matthew M Churpek Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-07
Authors: Blaise T Soberano; Patrick Brady; Toni Yunger; Rhonda Jones; Erin Stoneman; Tina Sosa; Erika L Stalets; Matthew Zackoff; Ranjit Chima; Ken Tegtmeyer; Maya Dewan Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Andrew W Phillips; Trevor C Yuen; Elizabeth Retzer; James Woodruff; Vineet Arora; Dana P Edelson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Chirayu Shah; Khaled Sanber; Rachael Jacobson; Bhavika Kaul; Sarah Tuthill; Vagish Hemmige; Elizabeth Guy; Stephen Greenberg Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2020-10