Aimee S Parnell1, Justine Shults2, J William Gaynor3, Mary B Leonard4, Dingwei Dai5, Chris Feudtner4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Mississippi, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi. Electronic address: aparnell@umc.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Administrative data are increasingly used to evaluate clinical outcomes and quality of care in pediatric congenital heart surgery (CHS) programs. Several published analyses of large pediatric administrative data sets have relied on the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG, version 24) diagnostic classification system. The accuracy of this classification system for patients undergoing CHS is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all 14,098 patients 0 to 5 years of age undergoing any of six selected congenital heart operations, ranging in complexity from isolated closure of a ventricular septal defect to single-ventricle palliation, at 40 tertiary-care pediatric centers in the Pediatric Health Information Systems database between 2007 and 2010. Assigned APR-DRGs (cardiac versus noncardiac) were compared using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests between those patients admitted during the first day of life versus later and between those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support versus those not. Recursive partitioning was used to assess the greatest determinants of APR-DRG type in the model. RESULTS: Every patient admitted on day 1 of life was assigned to a noncardiac APR-DRG (p<0.001 for each procedure). Similarly, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was highly associated with misclassification of CHS patients into a noncardiac APR-DRG (p<0.001 for each procedure). Cases misclassified into a noncardiac APR-DRG experienced a significantly increased mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In classifying patients undergoing CHS, APR-DRG coding has systematic misclassifications, which may result in inaccurate reporting of CHS case volumes and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Administrative data are increasingly used to evaluate clinical outcomes and quality of care in pediatric congenital heart surgery (CHS) programs. Several published analyses of large pediatric administrative data sets have relied on the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG, version 24) diagnostic classification system. The accuracy of this classification system for patients undergoing CHS is unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all 14,098 patients 0 to 5 years of age undergoing any of six selected congenital heart operations, ranging in complexity from isolated closure of a ventricular septal defect to single-ventricle palliation, at 40 tertiary-care pediatric centers in the Pediatric Health Information Systems database between 2007 and 2010. Assigned APR-DRGs (cardiac versus noncardiac) were compared using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests between those patients admitted during the first day of life versus later and between those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support versus those not. Recursive partitioning was used to assess the greatest determinants of APR-DRG type in the model. RESULTS: Every patient admitted on day 1 of life was assigned to a noncardiac APR-DRG (p<0.001 for each procedure). Similarly, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was highly associated with misclassification of CHSpatients into a noncardiac APR-DRG (p<0.001 for each procedure). Cases misclassified into a noncardiac APR-DRG experienced a significantly increased mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In classifying patients undergoing CHS, APR-DRG coding has systematic misclassifications, which may result in inaccurate reporting of CHS case volumes and mortality.
Keywords:
20; 21; 4; APR-DRG; All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups; CHS; D-TGA; DOL1; ECMO; HLHS; ICD-9-CM; PHIS; Pediatric Hospital Information Systems; TOF; VSD; congenital heart surgery; d-transposition of the great arteries, with or without VSD; day of life 1 admission; extracorporeal membrane support oxygenation; hypoplastic left heart syndrome; tetralogy of Fallot; using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification; ventricular septal defect
Authors: Christine G Gourin; Arlene A Forastiere; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Wayne M Koch; Shanthi Marur; Robert E Bristow Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: David M Shahian; Treacy Silverstein; Ann F Lovett; Robert E Wolf; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; Kathy J Jenkins; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Emile Bacha; Bohdan Maruszewski; David R Clarke; Christo I Tchervenkov; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Giovanni Stellin; Sean M O'Bien; Martin J Elliott; Constantine Mavroudis Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Sean M O'Brien; David R Clarke; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; Christian Pizarro; Karl F Welke; Bohdan Maruszewski; Zdzislaw Tobota; Weldon J Miller; Leslie Hamilton; Eric D Peterson; Constantine Mavroudis; Fred H Edwards Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Daniel Baram; Feroza Daroowalla; Ruel Garcia; Guangxiang Zhang; John J Chen; Erin Healy; Syed Ali Riaz; Paul Richman Journal: Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med Date: 2008-04-18
Authors: Marshall Lewis Jacobs; Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs; Rodney C G Franklin; Constantine Mavroudis; Francois Lacour-Gayet; Christo I Tchervenkov; Hal Walters; Emile A Bacha; David Robinson Clarke; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Giovanni Stellin; Tjark Ebels; Bohdan Maruszewski; Zdzislaw Tobota; Hiromi Kurosawa; Martin Elliott Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Sara K Pasquali; Xia He; Marshall L Jacobs; Samir S Shah; Eric D Peterson; Michael G Gaies; Matthew Hall; J William Gaynor; Kevin D Hill; John E Mayer; Jennifer S Li; Jeffrey P Jacobs Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Andrew Brennan; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Jean Connor; Cheryl O'Connell; Sthuthi David; Melvin Almodovar; James DiNardo; Puja Banka; John E Mayer; Audrey C Marshall; Lisa Bergersen Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 1.655