S Soldz1, D J Huyser, E Dorsey. 1. Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis, 1581 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA 02446, USA. ssoldz@bgsp.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Youth use of cigars has increased in the USA. Understanding brand preference among youth could help explain the attraction to cigars, and develop prevention strategies. This study reports on youth characteristics associated with preferences for cigar brands. DESIGN: Data are presented on 5006 students in grades 7-12 (ages 12-18 years) in classrooms administered the cigar use reasons evaluation (CURE), a questionnaire assessing alternative tobacco use (cigars, bidis, and kreteks). SETTING: Twelve middle and high schools across Massachusetts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferred brands of cigars. RESULTS: Cigar smoking was reported by 16.4% of the sample. The brands preferred by over 5% of cigar users were Phillies (overall prevalence: 31.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.9% to 34.3%), Black & Mild (12.3%, 95% CI 9.8% to 15.4%), Garcia y Vega (11.4%, 95% CI 9.3% to 13.8%), Swisher Sweets (9.6%, 95% CI 7.6% to 12.2%), Backwoods (6.1%, 95% CI 4.6% to 8.1%), and non-listed brands (16.4%, 95% CI 14.0% to 19.0%). Male cigar smokers were significantly more likely than females to prefer five brands: Backwoods, Dutch Masters, Garcia y Vega, Phillies, and Swisher Sweets, while females were more likely to prefer Black & Mild and non-listed brands. Brand preferences were also distinguished by self, friends' and siblings' tobacco use, race/ethnicity, parents' education and cigar use, GPA (grade point average), college plans, and community type. Urban students were more likely to prefer Black & Mild; students whose parents smoke cigars preferred non-listed brands. CONCLUSIONS: Youth prefer certain brands, most notably Phillies. Particular brands are preferred by particular youth subgroups, raising the possibility of selective marketing toward these groups.
OBJECTIVE: Youth use of cigars has increased in the USA. Understanding brand preference among youth could help explain the attraction to cigars, and develop prevention strategies. This study reports on youth characteristics associated with preferences for cigar brands. DESIGN: Data are presented on 5006 students in grades 7-12 (ages 12-18 years) in classrooms administered the cigar use reasons evaluation (CURE), a questionnaire assessing alternative tobacco use (cigars, bidis, and kreteks). SETTING: Twelve middle and high schools across Massachusetts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferred brands of cigars. RESULTS: Cigar smoking was reported by 16.4% of the sample. The brands preferred by over 5% of cigar users were Phillies (overall prevalence: 31.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.9% to 34.3%), Black & Mild (12.3%, 95% CI 9.8% to 15.4%), Garcia y Vega (11.4%, 95% CI 9.3% to 13.8%), Swisher Sweets (9.6%, 95% CI 7.6% to 12.2%), Backwoods (6.1%, 95% CI 4.6% to 8.1%), and non-listed brands (16.4%, 95% CI 14.0% to 19.0%). Male cigar smokers were significantly more likely than females to prefer five brands: Backwoods, Dutch Masters, Garcia y Vega, Phillies, and Swisher Sweets, while females were more likely to prefer Black & Mild and non-listed brands. Brand preferences were also distinguished by self, friends' and siblings' tobacco use, race/ethnicity, parents' education and cigar use, GPA (grade point average), college plans, and community type. Urban students were more likely to prefer Black & Mild; students whose parents smoke cigars preferred non-listed brands. CONCLUSIONS: Youth prefer certain brands, most notably Phillies. Particular brands are preferred by particular youth subgroups, raising the possibility of selective marketing toward these groups.
Authors: C Healton; P Messeri; J Reynolds; C Wolfe; C Stokes; J Ross; K Flint; W Robb; M Farrelly Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2000-01-28 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: F Baker; S R Ainsworth; J T Dye; C Crammer; M J Thun; D Hoffmann; J L Repace; J E Henningfield; J Slade; J Pinney; T Shanks; D M Burns; G N Connolly; D R Shopland Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Pitard; P Brennan; J Clavel; E Greiser; G Lopez-Abente; J Chang-Claude; J Wahrendorf; C Serra; M Kogevinas; P Boffetta Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Cristine D Delnevo; Eric S Pevzner; Michael B Steinberg; Charles W Warren; John Slade Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Frances A Stillman; Lee Bone; Erika Avila-Tang; Katherine Smith; Norman Yancey; Calvin Street; Kerry Owings Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Erika S Trapl; Joshua J Terchek; Laura Danosky; Leslie Cofie; Ashley Brooks-Russell; Scott H Frank Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Grace Kong; MeLisa R Creamer; Patricia Simon; Dana A Cavallo; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Josephine T Hinds; Howard Fishbein; Kevin Gutierrez Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Catherine G Corey; Shanta R Dube; Bridget K Ambrose; Brian A King; Benjamin J Apelberg; Corinne G Husten Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Tracey E Barnett; Thalia Smith; Ying He; Eric K Soule; Barbara A Curbow; Scott L Tomar; Christopher McCarty Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 3.295