INTRODUCTION: Inclusion of brand-specific examples (BE) in health surveys assessing lifetime and current cigar use has been shown to impact response rates. A split sample experimental design was used to investigate whether these rates are consistent by race, gender, and geographic locale. METHODS: The 2009 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey was conducted among 20 randomly selected high schools. Two versions of the survey were created; the first included items assessing lifetime and current cigar use with no brand-specific examples (NBE) while the second included BE in the items assessing cigar use. Both survey versions were distributed randomly within selected classrooms in participating schools. RESULTS: Within the City, both White and Black BE respondents reported higher lifetime cigar product use prevalence and current cigar product use compared to the NBE group; however, the difference was only significant among Black respondents (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.06). In the Outer Ring, White BE respondents were significantly less likely to report lifetime cigar use (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.98) and current cigar use (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.99) when compared with White NBE respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of BE in current measures of cigar product use may improve product use estimates in at-risk groups. However, better estimation of cigar product use may be accomplished by creating additional items to assess the use of subtypes of cigars.
INTRODUCTION: Inclusion of brand-specific examples (BE) in health surveys assessing lifetime and current cigar use has been shown to impact response rates. A split sample experimental design was used to investigate whether these rates are consistent by race, gender, and geographic locale. METHODS: The 2009 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey was conducted among 20 randomly selected high schools. Two versions of the survey were created; the first included items assessing lifetime and current cigar use with no brand-specific examples (NBE) while the second included BE in the items assessing cigar use. Both survey versions were distributed randomly within selected classrooms in participating schools. RESULTS: Within the City, both White and Black BE respondents reported higher lifetime cigar product use prevalence and current cigar product use compared to the NBE group; however, the difference was only significant among Black respondents (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.06). In the Outer Ring, White BE respondents were significantly less likely to report lifetime cigar use (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54 - 0.98) and current cigar use (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.99) when compared with White NBE respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of BE in current measures of cigar product use may improve product use estimates in at-risk groups. However, better estimation of cigar product use may be accomplished by creating additional items to assess the use of subtypes of cigars.
Authors: P Boffetta; G Pershagen; K H Jöckel; F Forastiere; V Gaborieau; J Heinrich; I Jahn; M Kreuzer; F Merletti; F Nyberg; F Rösch; L Simonato Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-04-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: F Baker; S R Ainsworth; J T Dye; C Crammer; M J Thun; D Hoffmann; J L Repace; J E Henningfield; J Slade; J Pinney; T Shanks; D M Burns; G N Connolly; D R Shopland Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rosalie V Caruso; Richard J O'Connor; Mark J Travers; Cristine D Delnevo; W Edryd Stephens Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Grace Kong; MeLisa R Creamer; Patricia Simon; Dana A Cavallo; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Josephine T Hinds; Howard Fishbein; Kevin Gutierrez Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Amanda Richardson; Valerie Williams; Jessica Rath; Andrea C Villanti; Donna Vallone Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Catherine G Corey; Shanta R Dube; Bridget K Ambrose; Brian A King; Benjamin J Apelberg; Corinne G Husten Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Catherine G Corey; Enver Holder-Hayes; Anh B Nguyen; Cristine D Delnevo; Brian L Rostron; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Heather L Kimmel; Amber Koblitz; Elizabeth Lambert; Jennifer L Pearson; Eva Sharma; Cindy Tworek; Andrew J Hyland; Kevin P Conway; Bridget K Ambrose; Nicolette Borek Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.244