Literature DB >> 12772987

Validation of dynamic MLC-controller log files using a two-dimensional diode array.

Jonathan G Li1, James F Dempsey, Li Ding, Chihray Liu, Jatinder R Palta.   

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in the step-and-shoot mode uses multiple static MLC segments to achieve intensity modulation. For typical IMRT treatment plans, significant numbers of segments are delivered with monitor units (MUs) of much less than 10. Verification of the ability of the linear accelerator (linac) to deliver small MU segments accurately is an important step in the IMRT commissioning and quality assurance (QA) process. Recent studies have reported large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs. These discrepancies could potentially cause large errors in the delivered patient dose. We have undertaken a systematic study to evaluate the accuracy of the dynamic MLC log files, which are created automatically by our commercial MLC workstation after each delivery, in recording the fractional MU delivered in the step-and-shoot mode. Two linac models were evaluated with simple-geometry leaf sequences and delivered with different total MUs and different nominal dose rates. A commercial two-dimensional diode array was used for the measurement. Large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs were found. The discrepancies were larger for small MU segments at higher dose rate, with some small MU segments completely undelivered. The recorded fractional MUs in the log files were found to agree with what was delivered within the limits of our experimental uncertainty. Our results indicate that it is important to verify the delivery accuracy of small MU segments that could potentially occur in a patient treatment and that the log files are useful in checking the integrity of the linac delivery once validated. Thus validated log files can be used as a QA tool for general IMRT delivery and patient-specific plan verification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12772987     DOI: 10.1118/1.1567951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  A Manikandan; B Sarkar; R Holla; T R Vivek; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Amit Sawant; Dan Ruan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dose verification for respiratory-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jianguo Qian; Lei Xing; Wu Liu; Gary Luxton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Paul Keall; Esben Schjodt Worm; Walther Fledelius; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance.

Authors:  Heng Li; Narayan Sahoo; Falk Poenisch; Kazumichi Suzuki; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Andrew K Lee; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Trajectory log file sensitivity: A critical analysis using DVH and EPID.

Authors:  Wui Ann Woon; Paul B Ravindran; Piyasiri Ekayanake; Subramani Vikraman; Siti Amirah; Yivonne Y F Lim; Christopher H S Vun; Jamsari Khalid
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-08-13

8.  QA of intensity-modulated beams using dynamic MLC log files.

Authors:  M Dinesh Kumar; N Thirumavalavan; D Venugopal Krishna; M Babaiah
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-01

9.  Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the Montpellier Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Pascal Fenoglietto; Benoit Laliberté; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Park; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jin-Beom Chung; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Yon-Lae Kim; Byung-Moon Park; Youhyun Kim; Jungmin Kim; Jonghak Choi; Jae-Sung Kim; Semie Hong; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.