Literature DB >> 12771826

Metrology to quantify wear and creep of polyethylene tibial knee inserts.

Orhun K Muratoglu1, Rebecca S Perinchief, Charles R Bragdon, Daniel O O'Connor, Reto Konrad, William H Harris.   

Abstract

Assessment of damage on articular surfaces of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene tibial knee inserts primarily has been limited to qualitative methods, such as visual observation and classification of features such as pitting, delamination, and subsurface cracking. Semiquantitative methods also have been proposed to determine the linear penetration and volume of the scar that forms on articular surfaces of tibial knee inserts. The current authors report a new metrologic method that uses a coordinate measuring machine to quantify the dimensions of this scar. The articular surface of the insert is digitized with the coordinate measuring machine before and after regular intervals of testing on a knee simulator. The volume and linear penetration of the scar are calculated by mathematically taking the difference between the digitized surface maps of the worn and unworn articular surfaces. Three conventional polyethylene tibial knee inserts of a posterior cruciate-sparing design were subjected to five million cycles of normal gait on a displacement-driven knee wear simulator in bovine serum. A metrologic method was used to calculate creep and wear contributions to the scar formation on each tibial plateau. Weight loss of the inserts was determined gravimetrically with the appropriate correction for fluid absorption. The total average wear volume was 43 +/- 9 and 41 +/- 4 mm3 measured by the metrologic and gravimetric methods, respectively. The wear rate averaged 8.3 +/- 0.9 and 8.5 +/- 1.6 mm3 per million cycles measured by the metrologic and gravimetric methods, respectively. These comparisons reflected strong agreement between the metrologic and gravimetric methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771826     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000063604.67412.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; David D McErlain; Jan-M Brandt; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J Macdonald; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; Robert B Bourne; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Relationship of surface damage appearance and volumetric wear in retrieved TKR polyethylene liners.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Priyanka Bhutani; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Christopher B Knowlton; Deborah J Hall; Michel P Laurent; Robert M Urban; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Retrieved Unicompartmental Implants with Full PE Tibial Components: The Effects of Knee Alignment and Polyethylene Thickness on Creep and Wear.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; A Poignard; P Filippini; S Zilber
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-04-11

6.  An autonomous mathematical reconstruction to effectively measure volume loss on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts.

Authors:  Christopher B Knowlton; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  CMM-Based Volumetric Assessment Methodology for Polyethylene Tibial Knee Inserts in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Cuicui Ji; Zhongmin Jin; Yuntian Dai
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.