Literature DB >> 12768381

Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999.

K-A Jansson1, P Blomqvist, F Granath, G Németh.   

Abstract

Despite being recognised for many years as a clinical diagnosis, no exact definition of spinal stenosis has yet been agreed, leading to difficulties in interpreting and comparing studies of the incidence, prevalence and treatment. This study presents the first analysis of national data to be reported. It is a retrospective population-based national register study, aimed at analyzing surgical interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, patient characteristics, subsequent development, and case fatality rate, based on Swedish national data for 1987-1999. Complete follow-up data were obtained of incidence and type of spinal stenosis surgery, rate of multiple operations, mortality, underlying causes of death, length of hospital stay, and case fatality rate by linkage of the National Inpatient Register and Swedish Death Register. The study cohort consisted of 10,494 patients. Laminectomy was performed in 89%, and additional fusion in 11%. The mean annual rate of operations was 9.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, the annual number of operations performed increased from 4.7 to 13.2 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The case fatality rate within 30 days after surgery was 3.5 per 1000 operations. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (46%). Relative risk of dying within 30 days of admission was doubled in men, and for fusion surgery, and increased four fold in patients older than 80 years. The relative risk of dying decreased during the study period. The results show that spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden has increased, and is associated with a low risk. Within an ageing group of patients, mortality has declined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12768381      PMCID: PMC3468016          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0544-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  B Strömqvist; B Jönsson; P Fritzell; O Hägg; B E Larsson; B Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-04

2.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; H J Nordal; B Magnaes; M Abdelnoor; F Lilleâs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis.

Authors:  A C Simotas; F J Dorey; K K Hansraj; F Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  N F Bolender; N S Schönström; D M Spengler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  The use of radiographic imaging studies in the evaluation of patients who have degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  S D Boden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study.

Authors:  C G Hutter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N S Schonstrom; N F Bolender; D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Thirty-day mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Parvizi; B G Johnson; C Rowland; M H Ereth; D G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo; R B Keller; A M Chapin; D L Patrick; J M Long; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden.

Authors:  K E Johnsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-10
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Gunnar Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmad; Abdulkader Hamad; Amit Bhalla; Sarah Turner; Birender Balain; David Jaffray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Central lumbar spinal stenosis: natural history of non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Per Wessberg; Karin Frennered
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Regional variations in lumbar spine surgery in Finland.

Authors:  Heikki Mäntymäki; Ville T Ponkilainen; Tuomas T Huttunen; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Asgeir S Jakola; Andreas Sørlie; Sasha Gulati; Oystein P Nygaard; Stian Lydersen; Tore Solberg
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Depressive symptoms during rehabilitation period predict poor outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year perspective.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Soili M Lehto; Timo Aalto; Olavi Airaksinen; Heikki Kröger; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; Robert Cole; David H Kim; Ling Li; Pradeep Suri; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Patient Satisfaction With Care Is Associated With Better Outcomes in Function and Pain 1 Year After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Björn Knutsson; Bakir Kadum; Ted Eneqvist; Sebastian Mukka; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-01-17

10.  The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Albert P Wong; Zachary A Smith; Rohan R Lall; Lacey E Bresnahan; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.