Literature DB >> 12767878

Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound.

L B Kaban1, P Thurmüller, M J Troulis, J Glowacki, D Wahl, B Linke, B Rahn, D H Perrott.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the stiffness of a porcine mandibular distraction wound at the end of neutral fixation.Twenty-four Yucatan minipigs underwent unilateral mandibular distraction: zero-day latency, rates of 1, 2, and 4 mm per day, distraction gap of 12 mm. Radiographic and ultrasound bone fill scores at 0, 8, 16 and 24 days of neutral fixation were used to evaluate interval healing. At sacrifice, biomechanical stiffness was determined using an Instron machine to produce a downward force of 2 mm/min at the premolar occlusal surface. Force (kilo-Newton, kN) and displacement (mm) were recorded at a rate of 10,000 points/second. Stiffness across the distraction wound, plain radiographic and ultrasound bone fill scores all increased with duration of neutral fixation and were highest for the 1 mm per day group at all time points. At the end of fixation, even in the most clinically stable group, stiffness across the distraction wound was only 25.5% of control.Despite clinical stability and high bone fill scores by X-ray and ultrasound, the distraction wound did not achieve normal stiffness at the end of neutral fixation in this model. This may have implications for the management of patients who undergo large movements by distraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12767878     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  7 in total

1.  Mandibular mechanics after osteotomy and distraction appliance placement I: Postoperative mobility of the osteotomy site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 2.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Lucy K Nagashima; Michelle Rondon-Newby; Ibrahim E Zakhary; William W Nagy; Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman; Mohammed E Elsalanty
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  The Effect of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Application on Distracted Bone Quality during Rapid Rate of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Marwa El Kassaby; Khaled Abd El Kader; Nahed Khamis; Alaa Al Hammoud; Alaa Ben Talb; Yasser Nabil El Hadidi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-19

5.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; John C Magill; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The effectiveness of ultrasound examination to assess the healing process of bone lesions of the jaws: a systematic review.

Authors:  Musu Davide; Shemesh Hagay; Boccuzzi Michela; Dettori Claudia; Cotti Elisabetta
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Qualitative assesement of newly formed bone after distraction osteogenesis of mandible in patients with facial asymmetry using 3 dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Abhay Datarkar; Bhavana Valvi; Suraj Parmar; Jagadish Patil
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-03-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.