Literature DB >> 12764587

[The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging].

W A Kalender1.   

Abstract

Clinical CT has reached a very high performance level by now. The introduction of spiral scanning and of multirow detectors have allowed to image even large body sections in very short time and with isotropic, high spatial resolution of better than 1 mm. For further improvements with respect to detector technology the use of flat-panel detectors (FPD), which have been developed for radiographic applications, is currently under investigation. In this article we discuss the general demands on CT detectors and specifically the suitability of FPDs with respect to CT imaging. FPDs offer excellent performance for the imaging of high-contrast structures with high spatial resolution.Low-contrast resolution and dose efficiency, however, do not yet reach the level of performance of dedicated CT detectors; temporal resolution is also limited. FPDs appear primarily suited for special applications in CT as for example 3D angiography or intraoperative imaging which also allows for improvements in workflow. For standard diagnostic CT they are not to be recommended at present, last but not least for dose reasons. The respective technical developments will have to be reassessed constantly in the future. The development of detector systems which are equally suited for radiography and CT constitutes an attractive goal.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12764587     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0897-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  35 in total

1.  Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone.

Authors:  Rajiv Gupta; Soenke H Bartling; Samit K Basu; William R Ross; Hartmut Becker; Armin Pfoh; Thomas Brady; Hugh D Curtin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Optimized intravenous Flat Detector CT for non-invasive visualization of intracranial stents: first results.

Authors:  Tobias Struffert; Stephan Kloska; Tobias Engelhorn; Yu Deuerling-Zheng; Sabine Ott; Marc Doelken; Marc Saake; Martin Köhrmann; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Flat-panel versus 64-channel computed tomography for in vivo quantitative characterization of aortic atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aboshady; Dianna D Cody; Evan M Johnson; Amir Gahremanpour; Deborah Vela; Kamal G Khalil; Herbert L Dupont; James T Willerson; L Maximilian Buja; Gregory W Gladish
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Flat panel computed tomography of human ex vivo heart and bone specimens: initial experience.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas Flohr; Karl Stierstorfer; Christoph R Becker; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Potential applications of flat-panel volumetric CT in morphologic and functional small animal imaging.

Authors:  Susanne Greschus; Fabian Kiessling; Matthias P Lichy; Jens Moll; Margareta M Mueller; Rajkumar Savai; Frank Rose; Clemens Ruppert; Andreas Günther; Marcus Luecke; Norbert E Fusenig; Wolfhard Semmler; Horst Traupe
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Managing the CT data explosion: initial experiences of archiving volumetric datasets in a mini-PACS.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Lee; Hak Jong Lee; Jae Hyoung Kim; Heung Sik Kang; Kyung Won Lee; Helen Hong; Ho Jun Chin; Kyoo Seob Ha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Prototype metal artefact reduction algorithm in flat panel computed tomography - evaluation in patients undergoing transarterial hepatic radioembolisation.

Authors:  Qeumars Mustafa Hamie; Adrian Raoul Kobe; Leif Mietzsch; Michael Manhart; Gilbert Dominique Puippe; Thomas Pfammatter; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  A comparison of angiographic CT and multisection CT in lumbar myelographic imaging.

Authors:  J-H Buhk; E Elolf; D Jacob; H-H Rustenbeck; A Mohr; M Knauth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms--a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Buhk; Kai Kallenberg; Alexander Mohr; Peter Dechent; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.