BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to provide an intraindividual comparison of angiographic CT (ACT) and multisection CT (MSCT) in lumbar myelographic imaging and to evaluate possible benefits of ACT, which is a further development of rotational angiography providing image data of high spatial and CT-like contrast resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 26 patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease a lumbar ACT was performed in combination with conventional lumbar myelography and followed by postmyelographic MSCT. Conventional lumbar myelography and lumbar ACT were performed with a flat panel detector-equipped angiographic device. Postmyelographic MSCT was performed with a 16-section CT scanner. Three experienced neuroradiologists rated anonymized sets of multiplanar reformatted CT and ACT images regarding diagnostic and technical parameters. The ratings were repeated after 2 months. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated to describe the levels of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The analysis shows that MSCT achieves higher ratings than ACT in all of the parameters asked. An adequate diagnostic quality was only assigned to 80% of the ACT acquisitions compared with 97% of the MSCT acquisitions. All of the mean kappa values were above 0.60, demonstrating a substantial intraobserver and interobserver agreement for MSCT, as well as for ACT. CONCLUSION: Using ACT, radiographic myelography and myelographic CT can be performed at the same imaging system. However, the results of our study show that the current myelographic ACT image quality fails to apply diagnostic standards. We, therefore, cannot recommend ACT as a general alternative to postmyelographic MSCT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to provide an intraindividual comparison of angiographic CT (ACT) and multisection CT (MSCT) in lumbar myelographic imaging and to evaluate possible benefits of ACT, which is a further development of rotational angiography providing image data of high spatial and CT-like contrast resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 26 patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease a lumbar ACT was performed in combination with conventional lumbar myelography and followed by postmyelographic MSCT. Conventional lumbar myelography and lumbar ACT were performed with a flat panel detector-equipped angiographic device. Postmyelographic MSCT was performed with a 16-section CT scanner. Three experienced neuroradiologists rated anonymized sets of multiplanar reformatted CT and ACT images regarding diagnostic and technical parameters. The ratings were repeated after 2 months. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated to describe the levels of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. RESULTS: The analysis shows that MSCT achieves higher ratings than ACT in all of the parameters asked. An adequate diagnostic quality was only assigned to 80% of the ACT acquisitions compared with 97% of the MSCT acquisitions. All of the mean kappa values were above 0.60, demonstrating a substantial intraobserver and interobserver agreement for MSCT, as well as for ACT. CONCLUSION: Using ACT, radiographic myelography and myelographic CT can be performed at the same imaging system. However, the results of our study show that the current myelographic ACT image quality fails to apply diagnostic standards. We, therefore, cannot recommend ACT as a general alternative to postmyelographic MSCT.
Authors: Joel E Gray; Benjamin R Archer; Priscilla F Butler; Barry B Hobbs; Fred A Mettler; Robert J Pizzutiello; Beth A Schueler; Keith J Strauss; Orhan H Suleiman; Martin J Yaffe Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Götz Benndorf; Charles M Strother; Benjamin Claus; Ramin Naeini; Hesham Morsi; Richard Klucznik; Michael E Mawad Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mateen Akhtar; Kalpesh T Vakharia; Jacob Mishell; Atul Gera; Thomas A Ports; Yerem Yeghiazarians; Andrew D Michaels Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.692