Literature DB >> 12761596

A model-based method for the prediction of whole-body absorbed dose and bone marrow toxicity for 186Re-HEDP treatment of skeletal metastases from prostate cancer.

Francesca M Buffa1, Glenn D Flux, Matt J Guy, Joe M O'Sullivan, Victor R McCready, Sarah J Chittenden, David P Dearnaley.   

Abstract

In high-activity rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate ((186)Re-HEDP) treatment of bone metastatic disease from prostate cancer the dose-limiting factor is haematological toxicity. In this study, we examined the correlation of the injected activity and the whole-body absorbed dose with treatment toxicity and response. Since the best response is likely to be related to the maximum possible injected activity limited by the whole-body absorbed dose, the relationship between pre-therapy biochemical and physiological parameters and the whole-body absorbed dose was studied to derive an algorithm to predict the whole-body absorbed dose prior to injection of the radionuclide. The whole-body retention of radioactivity was measured at several time points after injection in a cohort of patients receiving activities ranging between 2,468 MBq and 5,497 MBq. The whole-body absorbed dose was calculated by fitting a sequential series of exponential phases to the whole-body time-activity data and by integrating this fit over time to obtain the whole-body cumulated activity. This was then converted to absorbed dose using the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) committee methodology. Treatment toxicity was estimated by the relative decrease in white cell (WC) and platelet (Plt) counts after the injection of the radionuclide, and by their absolute nadir values. The criterion for a treatment response was a 50% or greater decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value lasting for 4 weeks. Alkaline phosphatase (AlkPh), chromium-51 ethylene diamine tetra-acetate ((51)Cr-EDTA) clearance rate and weight were measured before injection of the radionuclide. The whole-body absorbed dose showed a significant correlation with WC and Plt toxicity ( P=0.005 and 0.003 for the relative decrease and P=0.006 and 0.003 for the nadir values of WC and Plt counts respectively) in a multivariate analysis which included injected activity, whole-body absorbed dose, pre-treatment WC and Plt baseline counts, PSA and AlkPh values, and the pre-treatment Soloway score. The injected activity did not show any correlation with WC or Plt toxicity, but it did correlate with PSA response ( P=0.005). These results suggest that the administration of higher activities would be likely to generate a better response, but that the quantity of activity that can be administered is limited by the whole-body absorbed dose. We have derived and evaluated a model that estimates the whole-body absorbed dose on an individual patient basis prior to injection. This model uses the level of injected activity and pre-injection measurements of AlkPh, weight and (51)Cr-EDTA clearance. It gave good estimates of the whole-body absorbed dose, with an average difference between predicted and measured values of 15%. Furthermore, the whole-body absorbed dose predicted using this algorithm correlated with treatment toxicity. It could therefore be used to administer levels of activity on a patient-specific basis, which would help in the optimisation of targeted radionuclide therapy. We believe that algorithms of this kind, which use pre-injection biochemical and physiological measurements, could assist in the design of escalation trials based on a toxicity-limiting whole-body absorbed dose, rather than using the more conventional activity escalation approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12761596     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1197-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  17 in total

1.  Estimation and implications of random errors in whole-body dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Glenn D Flux; Matthew J Guy; Ruth Beddows; Matthew Pryor; Maggie A Flower
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Radiation dose estimates of 186Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate for palliation of metastatic osseous lesions: an animal model study.

Authors:  A van Aswegen; A Roodt; J Marais; J M Botha; H Naudé; M G Lötter; L Goedhals; M J Doman; A C Otto
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Prognostic factors in hormone-resistant progressing cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  S D Fosså; D P Dearnaley; M Law; J Gad; D W Newling; K Tveter
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan.

Authors:  M S Soloway; S W Hardeman; D Hickey; J Raymond; B Todd; S Soloway; M Moinuddin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Rhenium-186-HEDP palliative treatment in disseminated bone metastases due to prostate cancer.

Authors:  G Limouris; S K Shukla; A Manetou; I Kouvaris; G Plataniotis; N Triantafyllou; A V Rigas; L Vlahos
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  G Sgouros
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Rhenium-186-labeled hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate dosimetry and dosing guidelines for the palliation of skeletal metastases from androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  M C Graham; H I Scher; G B Liu; S D Yeh; T Curley; F Daghighian; S J Goldsmith; S M Larson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group.

Authors:  G J Bubley; M Carducci; W Dahut; N Dawson; D Daliani; M Eisenberger; W D Figg; B Freidlin; S Halabi; G Hudes; M Hussain; R Kaplan; C Myers; W Oh; D P Petrylak; E Reed; B Roth; O Sartor; H Scher; J Simons; V Sinibaldi; E J Small; M R Smith; D L Trump; G Wilding
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: internal radiation dosimetry: principles and applications.

Authors:  R E Toohey; M G Stabin; E E Watson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Estimates of red marrow dose by sacral scintigraphy in radioimmunotherapy patients having non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse bone marrow uptake.

Authors:  M Juweid; R M Sharkey; J A Siegel; T Behr; D M Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  8 in total

1.  A phase 2 study of high-activity 186Re-HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone.

Authors:  J M O'Sullivan; A R Norman; V R McCready; G Flux; F M Buffa; B Johnson; J Coffey; G Cook; J Treleaven; A Horwich; R A Huddart; C C Parker; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  A phase I study of combined docetaxel and repeated high activity 186Re-HEDP in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastatic to bone (the TAXIUM trial).

Authors:  Joyce M van Dodewaard-de Jong; John M H de Klerk; Haiko J Bloemendal; Bart P J van Bezooijen; Marie J de Haas; Richard H Wilson; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  The management of painful bone metastases with an emphasis on radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Darren J Hillegonds; Stephen Franklin; David K Shelton; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Vani Vijayakumar
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  The evidence base for the use of internal dosimetry in the clinical practice of molecular radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lidia Strigari; Mark Konijnenberg; Carlo Chiesa; Manuel Bardies; Yong Du; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Michael Lassmann; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  From fixed activities to personalized treatments in radionuclide therapy: lost in translation?

Authors:  G D Flux; K Sjogreen Gleisner; C Chiesa; M Lassmann; N Chouin; J Gear; M Bardiès; S Walrand; K Bacher; U Eberlein; M Ljungberg; L Strigari; E Visser; M W Konijnenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Phase I/II trials of 186Re-HEDP in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post-hoc analysis of the impact of administered activity and dosimetry on survival.

Authors:  Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; David P Dearnaley; Antigoni Divoli; Joe M O'Sullivan; V Ralph McCready; Bernadette Johnson; Yong Du; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Individualization of Radionuclide Therapies: Challenges and Prospects.

Authors:  Hanna Piwowarska-Bilska; Sara Kurkowska; Bozena Birkenfeld
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Reply to 'Single high dose versus repeated bone-targeted radionuclide therapy'.

Authors:  Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; David P Dearnaley; Antigoni Divoli; Joe M O'Sullivan; V Ralph McCready; Bernadette Johnson; Yong Du; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.