Literature DB >> 10550143

Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group.

G J Bubley1, M Carducci, W Dahut, N Dawson, D Daliani, M Eisenberger, W D Figg, B Freidlin, S Halabi, G Hudes, M Hussain, R Kaplan, C Myers, W Oh, D P Petrylak, E Reed, B Roth, O Sartor, H Scher, J Simons, V Sinibaldi, E J Small, M R Smith, D L Trump, G Wilding.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a glycoprotein that is found almost exclusively in normal and neoplastic prostate cells. For patients with metastatic disease, changes in PSA will often antedate changes in bone scan. Furthermore, many but not all investigators have observed an association between a decline in PSA levels of 50% or greater and survival. Since the majority of phase II clinical trials for patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) have used PSA as a marker, we believed it was important for investigators to agree on definitions and values for a minimum set of parameters for eligibility and PSA declines and to develop a common approach to outcome analysis and reporting. We held a consensus conference with 26 leading investigators in the field of AIPC to define these parameters. RESULT: We defined four patient groups: (1) progressive measurable disease, (2) progressive bone metastasis, (3) stable metastases and a rising PSA, and (4) rising PSA and no other evidence of metastatic disease. The purpose of determining the number of patients whose PSA level drops in a phase II trial of AIPC is to guide the selection of agents for further testing and phase III trials. We propose that investigators report at a minimum a PSA decline of at least 50% and this must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 or more weeks later. Patients may not demonstrate clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression during this time period. Some investigators may want to report additional measures of PSA changes (ie, 75% decline, 90% decline). Response duration and the time to PSA progression may also be important clinical end point.
CONCLUSION: Through this consensus conference, we believe we have developed practical guidelines for using PSA as a measurement of outcome. Furthermore, the use of common standards is important as we determine which agents should progress to randomized trials which will use survival as an end point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550143     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  245 in total

1.  Phase II study of abiraterone acetate in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer displaying bone flare discordant with serologic response.

Authors:  Charles J Ryan; Shreya Shah; Eleni Efstathiou; Matthew R Smith; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Glenn J Bubley; Christopher J Logothetis; Thian Kheoh; Christine Kilian; Christopher M Haqq; Arturo Molina; Eric J Small
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Analysis of circulating regulatory T cells in patients with metastatic prostate cancer pre- versus post-vaccination.

Authors:  Matteo Vergati; Vittore Cereda; Ravi A Madan; James L Gulley; Ngar-Yee Huen; Connie J Rogers; Kenneth W Hance; Philip M Arlen; Jeffrey Schlom; Kwong Y Tsang
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 3.  New trial designs to assess antitumor and antiproliferative agents in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Walter Stadler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  [How should hormone therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer be continued?].

Authors:  M Spahn; M Krebs
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  A phase I dose-escalation study of oral BR-DIM (BioResponse 3,3'- Diindolylmethane) in castrate-resistant, non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Heath; Lance K Heilbrun; Jing Li; Ulka Vaishampayan; Felicity Harper; Pam Pemberton; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Cilengitide (EMD 121974, NSC 707544) in asymptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients: a randomized phase II trial by the prostate cancer clinical trials consortium.

Authors:  Deborah A Bradley; Stephanie Daignault; Charles J Ryan; Robert S Dipaola; Kathleen A Cooney; David C Smith; Eric Small; Paul Mathew; Mitchell E Gross; Mark N Stein; Alice Chen; Kenneth J Pienta; June Escara-Wilke; Gerald Doyle; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; Evan T Keller; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Cabazitaxel (jevtana): a novel agent for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ginah Nightingale; Jae Ryu
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-08

8.  Assessing outcomes in prostate cancer clinical trials: a twenty-first century tower of Babel.

Authors:  Gretchen A Gignac; Michael J Morris; Glenn Heller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Falls and physical performance deficits in older patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Kathryn Bylow; William Dale; Karen Mustian; Walter M Stadler; Miriam Rodin; William Hall; Mark Lachs; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.