Literature DB >> 12361219

Estimation and implications of random errors in whole-body dosimetry for targeted radionuclide therapy.

Glenn D Flux1, Matthew J Guy, Ruth Beddows, Matthew Pryor, Maggie A Flower.   

Abstract

For targeted radionuclide therapy, the level of activity to be administered is often determined from whole-body dosimetry performed on a pre-therapy tracer study. The largest potential source of error in this method is due to inconsistent or inaccurate activity retention measurements. The main aim of this study was to develop a simple method to quantify the uncertainty in the absorbed dose due to these inaccuracies. A secondary aim was to assess the effect of error propagation from the results of the tracer study to predictive absorbed dose estimates for the therapy as a result of using different radionuclides for each. Standard error analysis was applied to the MIRD schema for absorbed dose calculations. An equation was derived to describe the uncertainty in the absorbed dose estimate due solely to random errors in activity-time data, requiring only these data as input. Two illustrative examples are given. It is also shown that any errors present in the dosimetry calculations following the tracer study will propagate to errors in predictions made for the therapy study according to the ratio of the respective effective half-lives. If the therapy isotope has a much longer physical half-life than the tracer isotope (as is the case, for example, when using 123I as a tracer for 131I therapy) the propagation of errors can be significant. The equations derived provide a simple means to estimate two potentially large sources of error in whole-body absorbed dose calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361219     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/17/311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  EANM Dosimetry Committee guidance document: good practice of clinical dosimetry reporting.

Authors:  M Lassmann; C Chiesa; G Flux; M Bardiès
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Dosimetry of yttrium-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for internal therapy: 86Y or 90Y imaging?

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Glenn D Flux; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Renaud Lhommel; Stanislas Pauwels; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Development and comparison of three 89Zr-labeled anti-CLDN18.2 antibodies to noninvasively evaluate CLDN18.2 expression in gastric cancer: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Guilan Hu; Wenjia Zhu; Yu Liu; Yuan Wang; Zheng Zhang; Shikun Zhu; Wenwen Duan; Peipei Zhou; Chao Fu; Fang Li; Li Huo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  A dose-effect correlation for radioiodine ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Glenn D Flux; Masud Haq; Sarah J Chittenden; Susan Buckley; Cecilia Hindorf; Kate Newbold; Clive L Harmer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  EANM procedure guidelines for 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) therapy.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Arturo Chiti; Michael Lassmann; Boudewijn Brans; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  A model-based method for the prediction of whole-body absorbed dose and bone marrow toxicity for 186Re-HEDP treatment of skeletal metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Francesca M Buffa; Glenn D Flux; Matt J Guy; Joe M O'Sullivan; Victor R McCready; Sarah J Chittenden; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the "Holy Gray".

Authors:  B Brans; L Bodei; F Giammarile; O Linden; M Luster; W J G Oyen; J Tennvall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  From fixed activities to personalized treatments in radionuclide therapy: lost in translation?

Authors:  G D Flux; K Sjogreen Gleisner; C Chiesa; M Lassmann; N Chouin; J Gear; M Bardiès; S Walrand; K Bacher; U Eberlein; M Ljungberg; L Strigari; E Visser; M W Konijnenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  EANM practical guidance on uncertainty analysis for molecular radiotherapy absorbed dose calculations.

Authors:  Jonathan I Gear; Maurice G Cox; Johan Gustafsson; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Iain Murray; Gerhard Glatting; Mark Konijnenberg; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.