Literature DB >> 12760630

Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.

Jeremy M Wolfe1, Serena J Butcher, Carol Lee, Megan Hyle.   

Abstract

Observers, searching for targets among distractor items, guide attention with a mix of top-down information--based on observers' knowledge--and bottom-up information--stimulus-based and largely independent of that knowledge. There are 2 types of top-down guidance: explicit information (e.g., verbal description) and implicit priming by preceding targets (top-down because it implies knowledge of previous searches). Experiments 1 and 2 separate bottom-up and top-down contributions to singleton search. Experiment 3 shows that priming effects are based more strongly on target than on distractor identity. Experiments 4 and 5 show that more difficult search for one type of target (color) can impair search for other types (size, orientation). Experiment 6 shows that priming guides attention and does not just modulate response.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760630     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  107 in total

1.  Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Wythe L Whiting; Roberto Cabeza; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-06

2.  Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times.

Authors:  Kazuya Ishibashi; Shinichi Kita; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Searching from the top down: ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection.

Authors:  Wythe L Whiting; David J Madden; Thomas W Pierce; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-01

5.  Adult age differences in the implicit and explicit components of top-down attentional guidance during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Wythe L Whiting; Julia Spaniol; Barbara Bucur
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-06

6.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Styrmir Saevarsson; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

9.  The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Fernando Vargas-Martin; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.

Authors:  Khena M Swallow; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.