Literature DB >> 15881292

Searching from the top down: ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection.

Wythe L Whiting1, David J Madden, Thomas W Pierce, Philip A Allen.   

Abstract

Previous investigations of adult age differences in visual search suggest that an age-related decline may exist in attentional processes dependent on the observer's knowledge of task-relevant features (top-down processing). The present experiments were conducted to examine age-related changes in top-down attentional guidance during a highly efficient form of search, singleton detection. In Experiment 1 reaction times to detect targets were lower when target features were constant (feature condition) than when target features were allowed to vary between trials (mixed condition), and this reaction time benefit was similar for younger and older adults. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated possible interactions between top-down and bottom-up (stimulus-driven) processes. Experiment 2 demonstrated that search times for both age groups could be improved when targets varied on an additional feature from distractors (double-feature condition) but only when top-down control was available (feature search). In Experiment 3, the availability of top-down guidance enabled both younger and older adults to override the distracting effects of a noninformative spatial location cue. 'l'hese findings indicate that top-down attentional control mechanisms interact with bottom-up processes to guide search for targets, and that in the context of singleton detection these mechanisms of top-down control are preserved for older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15881292      PMCID: PMC1805468          DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  34 in total

1.  Age differences in the control of looking behavior: do you know where your eyes have been?

Authors:  A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  Age-related effects in the marking of old objects in visual search.

Authors:  A F Kramer; P Atchley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-06

3.  Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.

Authors:  J Hodsoll; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

4.  Priming of two-dimensional visual motion is reduced in older adults.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Yue-Jia Luo; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Adult age differences in attentional allocation during memory search.

Authors:  D J Madden; T W Pierce; P A Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-12

7.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; R Burger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account.

Authors:  A Found; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

10.  Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  When age is irrelevant: distractor inhibition and target activation in priming of pop-out.

Authors:  Marta Wnuczko; Jay Pratt; Lynn Hasher; Rob Walker
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions.

Authors:  Barbara Bucur; David J Madden; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-09

3.  Adult age differences in the implicit and explicit components of top-down attentional guidance during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Wythe L Whiting; Julia Spaniol; Barbara Bucur
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-06

4.  Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.

Authors:  Wythe L Whiting; David J Madden; Katherine J Babcock
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-06

5.  Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Fergus I M Craik; Brian Levine; Sylvain Moreno; Gary Naglie; HeeSun Choi
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-10-11

6.  Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; Benjamin R Geib; Rachel E Siciliano; Lauren E Packard; Catherine W Tallman; David J Madden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Age-related preservation of top-down control over distraction in visual search.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; David J Madden; Anne M Shepler; Stephen R Mitroff; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2019-05-03

10.  Functional brain connectivity and cognition: effects of adult age and task demands.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Chou; Nan-Kuei Chen; David J Madden
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.