Literature DB >> 12757089

Comparison of intraocular pressure profiles during cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction.

Aharon Grinbaum1, Michael Blumenthal, Ehud Assia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In view of reports of fluctuations in intraocular pressure (IOP) during phacoemulsification, real-time IOP during small-incision, manual extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and phacoemulsification was measured to determine the effect of anterior chamber maintainer infusion on intraoperative IOP dynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparative study of IOP during cataract surgery was conducted by these two methods in 29 patients. An anterior chamber maintainer infused balanced salt solution continuously into the eye throughout ECCE. The anterior chamber maintainer was open in 7 cases throughout phacoemulsification and switched off during phacoemulsification in 7 cases.
RESULTS: IOP measurements during small-incision ECCE were physiologic (range, 5 to 20 mm Hg) during most of the operation and coincided with the value of hydrostatic pressure established by the height of the anterior chamber maintainer infusion bottle. During phacoemulsification without concomitant anterior chamber maintainer, IOP was positive (> 2 to 3 mm Hg) as long as the phacoemulsification infusion line was activated (position 1). Moving to position 0 caused hypotony. Occlusion breaks occasionally caused wide fluctuations in IOP. Concomitant anterior chamber maintainer and phacoemulsification infusion did not prevent surges, but may account for the lower range of fluctuation. The anterior chamber maintainer also maintained a positive IOP at position 0 during phacoemulsification.
CONCLUSIONS: An anterior chamber maintainer in conjunction with a self-sealing incision can maintain stable physiologic IOP during small-incision ECCE. The IOP fluctuations during phacoemulsification, especially during occlusion breaks, can be attenuated by an anterior chamber maintainer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12757089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging        ISSN: 1542-8877


  6 in total

1.  Effect of simulated dynamic intraocular pressure on retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ding Chen; Jun Zhu; Jin Li; Xi-Xia Ding; Fan Lu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification using continuous anterior chamber infusion versus those using ophthalmic viscosurgical device: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B K Nayak; Elesh Kumar Jain
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Real-time intraocular pressure measurement during phacoemulsification in dogs ex vivo.

Authors:  Seonmi Kang; Sangwan Park; Hyunwoo Noh; Jiyoon Kwak; Kangmoon Seo
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Intraocular pressure variation after conventional extracapsular cataract extraction, manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification in an indigenous black population.

Authors:  Oluwatoyin Helen Onakpoya; Adenike Odunmorayo Adeoye; Bernice Oluwakemi Adegbehingbe; Sarat Abolore Badmus; Bolajoko Abidemi Adewara; Oluwaseun Olaniyi Awe; Patrick Agadaigho Udonwa
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  Injection time related to intraocular pressure using a CO2 driven preloaded injector: An experimental laboratory study.

Authors:  Jan N Weindler; Tadas Naujokaitis; Sonja K Schickhardt; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of two techniques for toric intraocular lens implantation: hydroimplantation versus ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.

Authors:  Yueqin Chen; Qian Cao; Chunyan Xue; Zhenping Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.209

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.