Literature DB >> 10638544

Feasibility and effects of decision aids.

S Molenaar1, M A Sprangers, F C Postma-Schuit, E J Rutgers, J Noorlander, J Hendriks, H C de Haes.   

Abstract

Decision aids for patients have recently been introduced in health care. A literature review was conducted to address the following research questions: 1) which types of decision aids have been developed?; 2) to what extent are they feasible, and acceptable to patients and health care providers?; 3) do decision aids affect the decision-making process and patients' outcomes? Thirty non-controlled (e.g., one-group-only designs) and controlled studies (e.g., randomized experimental designs) were identified. Decision aids were found to be feasible and acceptable to patients and to increase the agreement between patients' values and decisions and patients' knowledge. The effects of decision aids on decisions and on patients' outcomes, including decision uncertainty, satisfaction, and health, have rarely been addressed. When studied, the beneficial effects of decision aids on these outcomes appear to be rather modest. Implications for future development of decision aids and the design of studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10638544     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  50 in total

Review 1.  Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; H Llewellyn-Thomas; V Entwistle; A Coulter; A O'Connor; D R Rovner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

2.  Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.

Authors:  A J Sowden; C Forbes; V Entwistle; I Watt
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Development and testing of a decision aid on goals of care for advanced dementia.

Authors:  Seth F Einterz; Robin Gilliam; Feng Chang Lin; J Marvin McBride; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Testing whether decision aids introduce cognitive biases: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Holly A Derry; Jennifer McClure; Azadeh Stark; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Greene; Aleksandra Jankovic; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12-09

7.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Evaluating decision aids--where next?

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line.

Authors:  Ferran Pellisé; P Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Matthias Lenz; Jürgen Kasper
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2007-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.