Literature DB >> 10180658

Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged?

V A Entwistle1, A J Sowden, I S Watt.   

Abstract

Interventions to inform patients about health care options and to involve them in decisions about their care are now widely advocated. The question of which criteria should be used to judge the effectiveness of such interventions has, however, received little attention. The provision of research-based information about health care effectiveness to patients and the promotion of greater patient involvement in health care decision-making are likely to have a complex range of effects on: the information provided to patients; patients' acquisition of skills; patients' knowledge and emotions; how decisions are made; the quality of decisions; professional-patient relationships; the use of health care; the health of patients; satisfaction; and the organisation and cost of health services. Opinions about which effects are most important and how they should be measured and valued will be influenced by a variety of factors, including: the rationales and motives underlying interest in patient involvement in decision-making; the forms of patient involvement envisaged; and the types of interventions being considered. In the context of health care systems which aim primarily to improve health status and well-being, health outcomes should take priority over process variables such as decision-making behaviours and patients' knowledge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10180658     DOI: 10.1177/135581969800300208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  27 in total

1.  Editorial.

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle; Heather Buchan; Angela Coulter; Alejandro Jadad
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Helping patients access high quality health information.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Charnock; B Gann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

3.  Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.

Authors:  A J Sowden; C Forbes; V Entwistle; I Watt
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 4.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Using clinical databases in practice.

Authors:  Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

6.  Shared decision-making: the debate continues.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  The development of picture cards and their use in ascertaining characteristics of Chinese surgical patients' decision-making preferences.

Authors:  Amanda Henderson; David Shum; Wai-Tong Chien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  MATRIX - development and feasibility of a guide for quality assessment of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Matthias Lenz; Jürgen Kasper
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2007-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.