BACKGROUND: Race/ethnicity and culture influence illness perceptions, health beliefs and behaviors, and communication with health care providers. However, information about the impact of race/ethnicity on the understanding of cancer diagnosis and treatment plan is limited. METHODS: Nine hundred seventy-three cancer patients completed an information needs-assessment questionnaire prior to starting treatment at 20 geographically distinct clinical cancer sites within the University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program network. Chi2 Test was used to examine the association between race/ethnicity and education, occupation, and perception and use of available information. T test and analysis of covariance were used to examine race/ethnicity-based differences in concerns over understanding cancer diagnosis/treatment plan and the effect of race/ethnicity controlling for demographics. RESULTS: There were 904 non-Hispanic white and 69 nonwhite (blacks, Latinos, and others) patients in the sample. Whites and nonwhites were comparable in educational attainment and occupation. However, there was a statistically significant race/ethnicity-based difference in concerns over understanding the diagnosis and treatment plan for cancer, even after controlling for sex (male, female), age, education, and occupation (p < .001). More nonwhite patients indicated that additional information would have been helpful in dealing with these concerns (p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonwhite cancer patients reported more concerns about understanding their diagnosis and treatment plan and were more likely to indicate that additional information would have been helpful. The findings emphasize the need for oncology professionals to confirm patients' understanding and ensure patients' information needs have been met, particularly when working with racial/ethnic minorities.
BACKGROUND: Race/ethnicity and culture influence illness perceptions, health beliefs and behaviors, and communication with health care providers. However, information about the impact of race/ethnicity on the understanding of cancer diagnosis and treatment plan is limited. METHODS: Nine hundred seventy-three cancerpatients completed an information needs-assessment questionnaire prior to starting treatment at 20 geographically distinct clinical cancer sites within the University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program network. Chi2 Test was used to examine the association between race/ethnicity and education, occupation, and perception and use of available information. T test and analysis of covariance were used to examine race/ethnicity-based differences in concerns over understanding cancer diagnosis/treatment plan and the effect of race/ethnicity controlling for demographics. RESULTS: There were 904 non-Hispanic white and 69 nonwhite (blacks, Latinos, and others) patients in the sample. Whites and nonwhites were comparable in educational attainment and occupation. However, there was a statistically significant race/ethnicity-based difference in concerns over understanding the diagnosis and treatment plan for cancer, even after controlling for sex (male, female), age, education, and occupation (p < .001). More nonwhite patients indicated that additional information would have been helpful in dealing with these concerns (p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonwhite cancer patients reported more concerns about understanding their diagnosis and treatment plan and were more likely to indicate that additional information would have been helpful. The findings emphasize the need for oncology professionals to confirm patients' understanding and ensure patients' information needs have been met, particularly when working with racial/ethnic minorities.
Authors: Elizabeth A Jacobs; Kelly Karavolos; Paul J Rathouz; Timothy G Ferris; Lynda H Powell Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: C Daniel Mullins; Lisa Blatt; Confidence M Gbarayor; Hui-Wen Keri Yang; Claudia Baquet Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Claudia R Baquet; Kelly M Mack; Joy Bramble; Mary DeShields; Delores Datcher; Mervin Savoy; Kery Hummel; Shiraz I Mishra; Sandra E Brooks; Stephanie Boykin-Brown Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2005-05
Authors: Lauren M Hamel; Louis A Penner; Terrance L Albrecht; Elisabeth Heath; Clement K Gwede; Susan Eggly Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Susan Eggly; Louis A Penner; Nao Hagiwara; Richard Gonzalez; Felicity W K Harper; Elisabeth I Heath; Terrance L Albrecht Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Claudine Isaacs; George Luta; Shawna C Willey; Marc Boisvert; Felicity W K Harper; Karen Smith; Sara Horton; Minetta C Liu; Yvonne Jennings; Fikru Hirpa; Felicia Snead; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Susan Eggly; Rifky Tkatch; Louis A Penner; Lorna Mabunda; Janella Hudson; Robert Chapman; Jennifer J Griggs; Richard Brown; Terrance Albrecht Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Matthew Asare; Luke J Peppone; Joseph A Roscoe; Ian R Kleckner; Karen M Mustian; Charles E Heckler; Joseph J Guido; Mark Sborov; Peter Bushunow; Adedayo Onitilo; Charles Kamen Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sally J Rousseau; Sharon G Humiston; Amy Yosha; Paul C Winters; Starlene Loader; Vi Luong; Bonnie Schwartzbauer; Kevin Fiscella Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Naomi Y Ko; Frederick R Snyder; Peter C Raich; Electra D Paskett; Donald J Dudley; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul H Levine; Karen M Freund Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 6.860