Literature DB >> 12749055

What does "a gene for heart disease" mean? A focus group study of public understandings of genetic risk factors.

Benjamin R Bates1, Alan Templeton, Paul J Achter, Tina M Harris, Celeste M Condit.   

Abstract

There is growing concern in the medical community about potential genetic determinism in the patient population. Limited information about the public understanding of genetic factors in disease formation is available. To access public perceptions of potentially deterministic phrasing of genetic risk factors, we sought to establish interpretations of the phrase, "a gene for heart disease." Focus groups in urban, suburban, and rural communities were conducted from July through October, 2001 in Georgia. A total of 108 participants were recruited. Participants were recruited to balance sex and racial representation. We used three outcome measures for participants understandings of the phrase: (1) participants' statements of the meaning of the phrase; (2) the level of determinism assigned to genetic factors by participants; and (3) participant reports of the health consequences of having "a gene for heart disease." Participants did not report a single interpretation of the phrase. There were dominant participant interpretations under each outcome measure: (1) "a gene for heart disease" was interpreted as meaning genetic and environmental factors both played roles in disease formation; (2) genetic predisposition was perceived as heightened, not absolute, risk; (3) the perceived health impact was a greater risk of becoming sick. Minority interpretations were found under each measure. Overall, naming "a gene for heart disease" does not appear to have a deterministic impact on a plurality of participants' perceptions of risks associated with genetic factors. Genetic fatalism in patient populations may be confined to a sizable minority. Important considerations for provider intervention and patient education are indicated. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12749055     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  29 in total

1.  Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications.

Authors:  C M Condit; L Shen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Development and validation of tools to assess genetic discrimination and genetically based racism.

Authors:  Roxanne L Parrott; Kami J Silk; Megan R Dillow; Janice L Krieger; Tina M Harris; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Spontaneous mental associations with the words "side effect": Implications for informed and shared decision making.

Authors:  Sonya Izadi; Thorsten Pachur; Courtney Wheeler; Jaclyn McGuire; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-05-24

4.  Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: views of underserved communities.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Christopher D Hartmann; Laura Morello; Sanjur Brooks; Kari Colón-Zimmermann; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-03-15

5.  Biotech 101: an educational outreach program in genetics and biotechnology.

Authors:  Kelly M East; Adam M Hott; Nancy P Callanan; Neil E Lamb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Parental Perception of Self-Empowerment in Pediatric Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Reactions of Parents to the Communication of Actual and Hypothetical CYP2D6 Test Results.

Authors:  Sarah Adelsperger; Cynthia A Prows; Melanie F Myers; Cassandra L Perry; Ariel Chandler; Ingrid A Holm; John A Lynch
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-08-30

Review 9.  Public health genomics and genetic test evaluation: the challenge of conducting behavioural research on the utility of lifestyle-genetic tests.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2008-08-06

10.  Causal beliefs about obesity and associated health behaviors: results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.