Literature DB >> 16080668

Development and validation of tools to assess genetic discrimination and genetically based racism.

Roxanne L Parrott1, Kami J Silk, Megan R Dillow, Janice L Krieger, Tina M Harris, Celeste M Condit.   

Abstract

It is possible that communication from mass media, public health or consumer advertising sources about human genetics and health may reify stereotypes of racialized social groups, perhaps cueing or exacerbating discriminatory and racist attitudes. This research used a multifaceted approach to assess lay perceptions of genetic discrimination and genetically based racism (N = 644). Two tools for use in strategic planning efforts associated with communicating about human genetics and health, the genetic discrimination instrument (GDI) and the genetically based racism instrument (GBRI), were derived. The GDI emerged as having five dimensions associated with lay perceptions of genetic discrimination. The GBRI was found to be unidimensional. Scale validation activities supported the tools' concurrent and discriminant validity characteristics. Significant differences between blacks and whites on the criminal control rights, social reproductive rights and employer rights factors as well as the GBRI were found. We recommend application of these screening tools prior to national dissemination of messages associated with genes and disease susceptibility, including school and university-based curricula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16080668      PMCID: PMC2569300     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  20 in total

1.  Privacy in genetics research.

Authors:  B P Fuller; M J Kahn; P A Barr; L Biesecker; E Crowley; J Garber; M K Mansoura; P Murphy; J Murray; J Phillips; K Rothenberg; M Rothstein; J Stopfer; G Swergold; B Weber; F K Collins; K L Hudson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Shattuck lecture--medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  F S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Informed lay preferences for delivery of racially varied pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bevan; Jonh A Lynch; Tasha N Dubriwny; Tina M Harris; Paul J Achter; Amy L Reeder; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Racism and human genome diversity research: the ethical limits of "population thinking".

Authors:  L Gannett
Journal:  Philos Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.317

5.  Focus groups: collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena.

Authors:  P E Stevens
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.462

6.  Genetic discrimination and health insurance: an urgent need for reform.

Authors:  K L Hudson; K H Rothenberg; L B Andrews; M J Kahn; F S Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Attitudinal barriers to delivery of race-targeted pharmacogenomics among informed lay persons.

Authors:  Celeste Condit; Alan Templeton; Benjamin R Bates; Jennifer L Bevan; Tina M Harris
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Exploration of the impact of messages about genes and race on lay attitudes.

Authors:  C M Condit; R L Parrott; B R Bates; J Bevan; P J Achter
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Factors influencing maternal estimates of genetic risk.

Authors:  E E Ekwo; B F Seals; J O Kim; R A Williamson; J W Hanson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-03

Review 10.  Genetic fatalism and social policy: the implications of behavior genetics research.

Authors:  J S Alper; J Beckwith
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences: A Backdoor to Eugenics?

Authors:  Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link; Naumi M Feldman
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2013-04-01

2.  Attitudes on DNA ancestry tests.

Authors:  Jennifer K Wagner; Kenneth M Weiss
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  The Politics of the Gene: Social Status and Beliefs about Genetics for Individual Outcomes.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Jeremy Freese; Bruce G Link; Jo C Phelan
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA.

Authors:  Ilan Dar-Nimrod; Steven J Heine
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers.

Authors:  Cody Brannan; Alexandra L Foulkes; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  Young Adults' Belief in Genetic Determinism, and Knowledge and Attitudes towards Modern Genetics and Genomics: The PUGGS Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rebecca Bruu Carver; Jérémy Castéra; Niklas Gericke; Neima Alice Menezes Evangelista; Charbel N El-Hani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Parental Education, Household Income, Race, and Children's Working Memory: Complexity of the Effects.

Authors:  Golnoush Akhlaghipour; Shervin Assari
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Parental Educational Attainment and Academic Performance of American College Students; Blacks' Diminished Returns.

Authors:  Shervin Assari
Journal:  J Health Econ Dev       Date:  2019
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.