Literature DB >> 26346146

Neurosonography: in pursuit of an optimized examination.

Alan Daneman1, Monica Epelman.   

Abstract

This article emphasizes technical factors that are helpful for optimizing sonographic examinations of the brain in preterm and term neonates. It also reviews existing data regarding the accuracy of neurosonographic examinations relative to MR. Many neurosonographic signs are subtle and can be easily overlooked, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. Therefore meticulous attention to sonographic technique is required to maximize the diagnostic utility of this modality. Although MR images of the brain often depict abnormalities more clearly than sonography, neurosonography continues to be an exceptionally valuable tool for evaluation of the neonatal brain, even in full-term neonates. Furthermore, its accuracy is greater, even in the latter age group, than many older publications suggest. Prospective studies using state-of-the-art equipment comparing findings on sonography and MR are needed to better understand how the accuracy of these modalities changes with refinements in equipment and to help us better understand the role of neurosonography relative to MR.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26346146     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3357-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  15 in total

1.  Color Doppler US of normal cerebral venous sinuses in neonates: a comparison with MR venography.

Authors:  Elka Miller; Alan Daneman; Andrea S Doria; Susan Blaser; Jeffrey Traubici; Jose Jarrin; Rahim Moineddin; Aideen Moore; Manohar Shroff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04-25

Review 2.  Imaging of the brain in full-term neonates: does sonography still play a role?

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Monica Epelman; Susan Blaser; Jose Ricardo Jarrin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16

3.  Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome.

Authors:  A M Roelants-van Rijn; F Groenendaal; F J Beek; P Eken; I C van Haastert; L S de Vries
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.947

4.  Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants.

Authors:  A M Childs; L Cornette; L A Ramenghi; S F Tanner; R J Arthur; D Martinez; M I Levene
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 5.  Easily overlooked sonographic findings in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy: lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  David Dinan; Alan Daneman; Carolina V Guimaraes; Nancy A Chauvin; Teresa Victoria; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants.

Authors:  E F Maalouf; P J Duggan; S J Counsell; M A Rutherford; F Cowan; D Azzopardi; A D Edwards
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The intracranial venous system in infants: normal and abnormal findings on duplex and color Doppler sonography.

Authors:  L M Dean; G A Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  White matter injury in the premature infant: a comparison between serial cranial sonographic and MR findings at term.

Authors:  Terrie E Inder; Nigel J Anderson; Carole Spencer; Scott Wells; Joseph J Volpe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Limitations of ultrasonography for diagnosing white matter damage in preterm infants.

Authors:  T Debillon; S N'Guyen; A Muet; M P Quere; F Moussaly; J C Roze
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Early MR features of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonates with periventricular densities on sonograms.

Authors:  L T Sie; M S van der Knaap; G van Wezel-Meijler; A H Taets van Amerongen; H N Lafeber; J Valk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.