Literature DB >> 12736129

Cognitive Load and Prism Adaptation.

G. M. Redding1, S. D. Rader, D. R. Lucas.   

Abstract

Subjects wore goggles with prisms that laterally displaced the visual field (rightward by 11.4 degree) and with full view of the limb engaged in paced (2-s rate) sagittal pointing at either an implicit ("straight ahead of the nose") target (Experiment 1) or an explicit (positioned leftward by 11.4 degree) target (in Experiment 2). In experimental conditions, subjects performed a secondary cognitive task (mental arithmetic) simultaneously during target pointing. In control conditions, no cognitive load was imposed. Aftereffect measures of adaptation to the prismatic displacement were not substantially different when problem solving was required, but terminal error of the exposure pointing task was reliably affected by cognitive load. These results are consistent with the hypothesis of separable mechanisms for adaptive coordination and adaptive alignment. Adaptive coordination may be mediated by strategically flexible coordinative linkage between sensory motor systems (eye-head and hand-head), but spatial alignment seems to be mediated by adaptive encoders within coordinatively linked subsystems. If the coordination task involves predominately automatic processing, coordinative linkage can be frequent enough under cognitive load for substantial realignment to occur even though exposure performance (adaptive coordination) may be less than optimal.

Year:  1992        PMID: 12736129     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1992.9941619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  16 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Barbara Mair; Josef Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensorimotor adaptation is influenced by background music.

Authors:  Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Altering attention to split-belt walking increases the generalization of motor memories across walking contexts.

Authors:  Dulce M Mariscal; Pablo A Iturralde; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Reuter; Jeffery Bednark; Ross Cunnington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

7.  Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach.

Authors:  Timothy Judkins; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Visuomotor learning generalizes between bilateral and unilateral conditions despite varying degrees of bilateral interference.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; J Toby Mordkoff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Generalization of visuomotor learning between bilateral and unilateral conditions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Motor-sensory recalibration modulates perceived simultaneity of cross-modal events at different distances.

Authors:  Brent D Parsons; Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.