Literature DB >> 20881203

Visuomotor learning generalizes between bilateral and unilateral conditions despite varying degrees of bilateral interference.

Jinsung Wang1, J Toby Mordkoff, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Bilateral interference, referring to the tendency of movements of one arm to disrupt the intended movements made simultaneously with the other arm, is often observed in a task that involves differential planning of each arm movement during sensorimotor adaptation. In the present study, we examined two questions: 1) how does the compatibility between visuomotor adaptation tasks performed with both arms affect bilateral interference during bimanual performance? and 2) how do variations in bilateral interference affect transfer of visuomotor adaptation between bilateral and unilateral conditions? To examine these questions, we manipulated visuomotor compatibility using two kinematic variables (direction of required hand motion, direction of an imposed visual rotation). Experiment 1 consisted of two conditions in which the direction of visual rotations for both arms was either in the same or opposing directions, whereas the target direction for both arms was always the same. In experiment 2, we examined the pattern of generalization between the bilateral and unilateral conditions when both the target and rotation directions were opposing between the arms. In both experiments, subjects first adapted to a 30° visual rotation with one arm (preunilateral), then with both arms (bilateral), and finally with the arm that was not used in the first session (postunilateral). Our results show that bilateral interference was smallest when both variables were the same between the arms. Our data also show extensive transfer of visuomotor adaptation between bilateral and unilateral conditions, regardless of degree of bilateral interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881203      PMCID: PMC3007628          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00225.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  H A Ingram; P van Donkelaar; J Cole; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions.

Authors:  Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  When visuo-motor incongruence aids motor performance: the effect of perceiving motion structures during transformed visual feedback on bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Hedwig Bogaerts; Martinus J Buekers; Frank T Zaal; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.230

7.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Isaac Kurtzer; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Carolee J Winstein; J Phillip Miller; Paul A Thompson; Edward Taub; Gitendra Uswatte; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah Nichols-Larsen; Patricia C Clark
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 44.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rl Sainburg; D Good; A Przybyla
Journal:  J Neurol Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23

2.  Generalization of visuomotor adaptation depends on the spatial characteristic of visual workspace.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brisk heart rate and EEG changes during execution and withholding of cue-paced foot motor imagery.

Authors:  Gert Pfurtscheller; Teodoro Solis-Escalante; Robert J Barry; Daniela S Klobassa; Christa Neuper; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Substantial generalization of sensorimotor learning from bilateral to unilateral movement conditions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Khongchee Xiong; Katie Marek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.