Literature DB >> 24259549

Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach.

Timothy Judkins1, Robert A Scheidt.   

Abstract

We examined whether visual and proprioceptive estimates of transient (midreach) target capture errors contribute to motor adaptation according to the probabilistic rules of information integration used for perception. Healthy adult humans grasped and moved a robotic handle between targets in the horizontal plane while the robot generated springlike loads that varied unpredictably from trial to trial. For some trials, a visual cursor faithfully tracked hand motion. In others, the handle's position was locked and subjects viewed motion of a point-mass cursor driven by hand forces. In yet other trials, cursor feedback was dissociated from hand motion or altogether eliminated. We used time- and frequency-domain analyses to characterize how sensorimotor memories influence performance on subsequent reaches. When the senses were used separately, subjects were better at rejecting physical disturbances applied to the hand than virtual disturbances applied to the cursor. In part, this observation reflected differences in how participants used sensorimotor memories to adapt to perturbations when performance feedback was limited to only proprioceptive or visual information channels. When both vision and proprioception were available to guide movement, subjects processed memories in a manner indistinguishable from the vision-only condition, regardless of whether the cursor tracked the hand faithfully or whether we experimentally dissociated motions of the hand and cursor. This was true even though, on average, perceptual uncertainty in the proprioceptive estimation of movement extent exceeded that of visual estimation by just 47%. In contrast to perceptual tasks wherein vision and proprioception both contribute to an optimal estimate of limb state, our findings support a switched-input, multisensory model of predictive load compensation wherein visual feedback of transient performance errors overwhelmingly dominates proprioception in determining adaptive reach performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  learning; memory; multisensory integration; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259549      PMCID: PMC3921390          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00314.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  78 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load.

Authors:  D L Weeks; M P Aubert; A G Feldman; M F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez; Supriya Asnani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  8 in total

1.  Transfer of dynamic motor skills acquired during isometric training to free motion.

Authors:  Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Michael Tan; Moria Fisher Bittmann; Etienne Burdet; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Divisively Normalized Integration of Multisensory Error Information Develops Motor Memories Specific to Vision and Proprioception.

Authors:  Takuji Hayashi; Yutaro Kato; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Human Stiffness Perception and Learning in Interacting With Compliant Environments.

Authors:  Chie Takahashi; Morteza Azad; Vijaykumar Rajasekaran; Jan Babič; Michael Mistry
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Neural Correlates of Multisensory Integration for Feedback Stabilization of the Wrist.

Authors:  Aaron J Suminski; Raymond C Doudlah; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Learning to push and learning to move: the adaptive control of contact forces.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Assaf Pressman; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  A New Neurocognitive Interpretation of Shoulder Position Sense during Reaching: Unexpected Competence in the Measurement of Extracorporeal Space.

Authors:  Teresa Paolucci; Federico Zangrando; Giulia Piccinini; Federico Sciarra; Rocco Pallotta; Alice Mannocci; Giuseppe la Torre; Fabiano Bini; Franco Marinozzi; Stefano Gumina; Luca Padua; Vincenzo Maria Saraceni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Contributions of implicit and explicit memories to sensorimotor adaptation of movement extent during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Devon D Lantagne; Leigh Ann Mrotek; Rebecca Slick; Scott A Beardsley; Danny G Thomas; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of Tendon Vibration on Hemiparetic Arm Stability in Unstable Workspaces.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Bani Gadhoke; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.