Literature DB >> 12733636

Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combinations.

R V Rambau1, T J Robinson.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to construct a comparative chromosome map between the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus and the African four-striped mouse, Rhabdomys pumilio. A high degree of homology between the species was detected using both FISH and G-banding. Ten mouse chromosomes (2-4, 7, 14-16, 18, 19 and the X) were retained as chromosomal arms or intact chromosome blocks. Six mouse chromosome painting probes that correspond to mouse autosomes 5, 6, 8, 11, 12 and 13, produced double signals; the remaining four painting probes (1, 9, 10 and 17) hybridized to three or more R. pumilio chromosomes respectively. In total, the 20 mouse chromosome paints revealed 40 segments of conserved synteny in the R. pumilio genome. Most of the mouse chromosomes that produced single signals in R. pumilio have previously been shown to be conserved in the Black and Norwegian rats and the Chinese hamster. Eight contiguous segment associations appear to be R. pumilio specific, two were shared by R. pumilio and the Black and Norwegian rats, but to the exclusion of the Chinese hamster. Our data suggest that mouse chromosomes 1, 10, and 17 have undergone extensive rearrangements during genome evolution in the murids and may be useful markers for enhancing our understanding of the mode and tempo of chromosome evolution in rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12733636     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022887629707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  30 in total

1.  Phylogenomics. Ancestral primate viewed.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; R Stanyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting.

Authors:  F Yang; P C O'Brien; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  The Mouse Gene Map.

Authors:  Muriel T. Davisson; Dirck W. Bradt; Jennifer J. Merriam; Stephen F. Rockwood; Janan T. Eppig
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  1998

4.  A transgenic insertion causing cryptorchidism in mice.

Authors:  P A Overbeek; I P Gorlov; R W Sutherland; J B Houston; W R Harrison; H L Boettger-Tong; C E Bishop; A I Agoulnik
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Between rat and mouse zoo-FISH reveals 49 chromosomal segments that have been conserved in evolution.

Authors:  K Helou; A Walentinsson; G Levan; F Ståhl
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Comparative chromosome analysis (R- and C-bands) of two South African murid species, Lemniscomys rosalia and Rhabdomys pumilio (Rodentia, murinae).

Authors:  J F Ducroz; L Granjon; M Lombard; V Volobouev
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

Review 7.  The rat as an experimental animal.

Authors:  T J Gill; G J Smith; R W Wissler; H W Kunz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Molecular genetics of Rhabdomys pumilio subspecies boundaries: mtDNA phylogeography and karyotypic analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Ramugondo V Rambau; Roscoe Stanyon; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  The genome phylogeny of domestic cat, red panda and five mustelid species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and G-banding.

Authors:  Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Beiyuan Fu; Tian Ying; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting.

Authors:  M N Guilly; P Fouchet; P de Chamisso; A Schmitz; B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.620

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal evolution in Rodentia.

Authors:  S A Romanenko; P L Perelman; V A Trifonov; A S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse.

Authors:  Frederic Veyrunes; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Josette Catalan; Terence J Robinson; Janice Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Vitaly T Volobouev; Polina L Perelman; Vladimir S Lebedev; Natalya A Serdukova; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Nina Sh Bulatova; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Comparative chromosome painting map between two Ryukyu spiny rat species, Tokudaia osimensis and Tokudaia tokunoshimensis (Muridae, Rodentia).

Authors:  Taro Nakamura; Asato Kuroiwa; Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Kazumi Matsubara; Fumio Yamada; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.

Authors:  Raquel Chaves; Sandra Louzada; Susana Meles; Johannes Wienberg; Filomena Adega
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.

Authors:  Iris Hass; Ives José Sbalqueiro; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.

Authors:  Natalia A Sitnikova; Svetlana A Romanenko; Patricia C M O'Brien; Polina L Perelman; Beiyuan Fu; Nadezhda V Rubtsova; Natalya A Serdukova; Feodor N Golenishchev; Vladimir A Trifonov; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Chromosome homology between mouse and three Muridae species, Millardia meltada, Acomys dimidiatus and Micromys minutus, and conserved chromosome segments in murid karyotypes.

Authors:  Taro Nakamura; Kazumi Matsubara; Shumpei P Yasuda; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.

Authors:  Svetlana A Romanenko; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Serdukova; Vladimir A Trifonov; Larisa S Biltueva; Jinhuan Wang; Tangliang Li; Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Vitaly T Volobouev; Roscoe Stanyon; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.224

10.  Extensive Chromosomal Reorganization in the Evolution of New World Muroid Rodents (Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae): Searching for Ancestral Phylogenetic Traits.

Authors:  Adenilson Leão Pereira; Stella Miranda Malcher; Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi; Patricia Caroline Mary O'Brien; Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith; Ana Cristina Mendes-Oliveira; Julio Cesar Pieczarka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.