Literature DB >> 12733136

The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial.

Nils Bjurstam1, Lena Björneld, Jane Warwick, Evis Sala, Stephen W Duffy, Lennarth Nyström, Neil Walker, Erling Cahlin, Olof Eriksson, Lars-Olof Hafström, Halvard Lingaas, Jan Mattsson, Stellan Persson, Carl-Magnus Rudenstam, Håkan Salander, Johan Säve-Söderbergh, Torkel Wahlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence for a reduction in breast carcinoma mortality with mammographic screening, some doubts have been expressed, and there is still uncertainty regarding the age specific effects.
METHODS: The authors report on a randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening for breast carcinoma that was conducted among 51,611 women (21,650 women who were invited to a screening [the study group] and 29,961 women in a control group) ages 39-59 years in Gothenburg, Sweden. Among women in the study group, the screening interval was 18 months. The screening phase of the trial took place in 1982-1991, and follow-up for breast carcinoma mortality continued until December 31, 1996. Mortality from breast carcinoma was analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Overall and age specific effects of invitation to mammography screening on breast carcinoma mortality were calculated. Three mortality effects were estimated: the effect on deaths from breast tumors diagnosed during the screening phase of the trial, as assessed by an independent Endpoint Committee (the EPC evaluation model); the effect on deaths from breast carcinoma diagnosed during the screening phase of the trial, as determined by data from the National Cancer Registry and the National Cause of Death Register (the SCB evaluation model); and the effect on deaths from all breast carcinomas diagnosed up to December 31, 1996, as determined by the National Cancer Registry and the National Cause of Death Register (the SCB follow-up model).
RESULTS: A nonsignificant, 21% reduction in the rate of mortality from breast carcinoma with invitation to screening was observed using the EPC evaluation model (relative risk [RR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.58-1.08; P = 0.14); and a borderline significant, 23% rate reduction was observed using the SCB follow-up model (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-1.00; P = 0.05). Age specific analyses yielded greater mortality rate reductions for the groups of women ages 39-44 years, 45-49 years, and 55-59 years, but there was no mortality rate reduction in the group of women ages 50-54 years. The effects of invitation to mammographic screening on the incidence of lymph node-positive disease closely paralleled the effects of invitation on breast carcinoma mortality. The effect on breast carcinoma mortality was consistent with the effect on all-cause mortality, suggesting no bias in classification of cause of death. Breast carcinoma incidence in the study group was almost identical to the incidence in the control group after trial by screening had ended in the control group (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.09; P = 0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: The current results support the commonly observed 20-30% reduction in breast carcinoma mortality with invitation to screening. The impression that screening is less effective in women younger than 50 years may be an oversimplification. Age specific effects should be a target for further research. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11361

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12733136     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  49 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; James Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Gabriela Lewin; Richard Birtwhistle; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Nicole Hodgson; Donna Ciliska; Mary Gauld; Yan Yun Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Luo; Bor-Wen Cheng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  CJS debate: Is mammography useful in average-risk screening for breast cancer?

Authors:  Muriel Brackstone; Steven Latosinsky; Elizabeth Saettler; Ralph George
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Screening mammography: Authors' response to Nyström and Tabar and colleagues.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  A comparison of two Native American Navigator formats: face-to-face and telephone.

Authors:  Mark B Dignan; Linda Burhansstipanov; Judy Hariton; Lisa Harjo; Terri Rattler; Rose Lee; Mondi Mason
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 6.  Statistical analyses in Swedish randomised trials on mammography screening and in other randomised trials on cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Mammography Screening: Evidence, History and Current Practice in Germany and Other European Countries.

Authors:  Cornelis Biesheuvel; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Svante Bergdahl; Ali Khatami; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.