Literature DB >> 12729381

A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?

Olivia L Carter1, John D Pettigrew.   

Abstract

Perceptual rivalry is an oscillation of conscious experience that takes place despite univarying. if ambiguous, sensory input. Much current interest is focused on the controversy over the neural site of binocular rivalry, a variety of perceptual rivalry for which a number of different cortical regions have been implicated. Debate continues over the relative role of higher levels of processing compared with primary visual cortex and the suggestion that different forms of rivalry involve different cortical areas. Here we show that the temporal pattern of disappearance and reappearance in motion-induced blindness (MIB) (Bonneh et al, 2001 Nature 411 798-801) is highly correlated with the pattern of oscillation reported during binocular rivalry in the same individual. This correlation holds over a wide range of inter-individual variation. Temporal similarity in the two phenomena was strikingly confirmed by the effects of the hallucinogen LSD, which produced the same, extraordinary, pattern of increased rhythmicity in both kinds of perceptual oscillation. Furthermore. MIB demonstrates the two properties previously considered characteristic of binocular rivalry. Namely the distribution of dominance periods can be approximated by a gamma distribution and, in line with Levelt's second proposition of binocular rivalry, predominance of one perceptual phase can be increased through a reduction in the predominance time of the opposing phase. We conclude that (i) MIB is a form of perceptual rivalry, and (ii) there may be a common oscillator responsible for timing aspects of all forms of perceptual rivalry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729381     DOI: 10.1068/p3472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  37 in total

1.  Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Werner Klotz; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

2.  Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.

Authors:  Benjamin T Backus; Qi Haijiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; James Stout; Christof Koch; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Melodic sound enhances visual awareness of congruent musical notes, but only if you can read music.

Authors:  Minyoung Lee; Randolph Blake; Sujin Kim; Chai-Youn Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Niels A Kloosterman; Thomas Meindertsma; Arjan Hillebrand; Bob W van Dijk; Victor A F Lamme; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

9.  Psilocybin links binocular rivalry switch rate to attention and subjective arousal levels in humans.

Authors:  Olivia L Carter; Felix Hasler; John D Pettigrew; Guy M Wallis; Guang B Liu; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Attention-like deficit and hyperactivity in a Drosophila memory mutant.

Authors:  Bruno van Swinderen; Björn Brembs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.