Literature DB >> 12728291

Two stages in crossmodal saccadic integration: evidence from a visual-auditory focused attention task.

Petra A Arndt1, Hans Colonius.   

Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (SRT) toward a visual target stimulus was measured under simultaneous presentation of an auditory non-target (accessory stimulus). Horizontal position of the target was varied (25 degrees left and right of fixation) as well as position and intensity of the auditory accessory. SRT was reduced under the presence of the accessory, and it decreased both with increasing intensity of the auditory accessory and with decreasing distance between target and accessory. The absence of a significant interaction between distance and auditory intensity suggests (1) that the intensity of the accessory stimulus has no direct influence on the process of crossmodal integration, and (2) that spatial position and intensity of the accessory are processed in separate stages. This was supported by a probability inequality test showing that the amount of neural coactivation depends on spatial distance but not on auditory intensity. The results are discussed in the framework of a two-stage model assuming separate processing of unimodal and bimodal characteristics of the stimuli. These results are related to several recent neurophysiological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728291     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1424-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain.

Authors:  O J Braddick; J M O'Brien; J Wattam-Bell; J Atkinson; R Turner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  E J Engelken; K W Stevens; J D Enderle
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1991-04

3.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

4.  Visually guided saccade versus eye-hand reach: contrasting neuronal activity in the cortical supplementary and frontal eye fields.

Authors:  H Mushiake; N Fujii; J Tanji
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Unit study of monkey frontal cortex: active localization of auditory and of visual stimuli.

Authors:  E Vaadia; D A Benson; R D Hienz; M H Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Separate-activation models with variable base times: testability and checking of cross-channel dependency.

Authors:  R Ulrich; M Giray
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

8.  The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts.

Authors:  B D Corneil; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  R A Andersen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Auditory and visual sensory representations in human prefrontal cortex as revealed by stimulus-evoked spike-wave complexes.

Authors:  J M Clarke; E Halgren; J M Scarabin; P Chauvel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual-tactile integration: does stimulus duration influence the relative amount of response enhancement?

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Catching audiovisual mice: predicting the arrival time of auditory-visual motion signals.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; S M Wuerger; G F Meyer; F Roehrbein; K Schill; C Zetzsche
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate.

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-29

4.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Redundant visual signals boost saccade execution.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Elena Betta
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

7.  Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Auditory facilitation of visual-target detection persists regardless of retinal eccentricity and despite wide audiovisual misalignments.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatial orienting in complex audiovisual environments.

Authors:  Davide Nardo; Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.