Literature DB >> 12711941

Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.

Michael J Yaremchuk1.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of clinical outcomes was performed to determine the clinical utility and morbidity associated with the use of porous polyethylene facial implants. Three hundred seventy implants were placed in 162 consecutive patients, in 178 operations performed in 11 years. The number of patients, the number of implants used, and the average follow-up period were categorized according to the cause of the deformity. The resultant distribution was as follows: acquired (tumor-related), 17 patients, 39 implants, and 30 months; congenital, eight patients, 31 implants, and 92 months; aesthetic, 39 patients, 97 implants, and 24 months; secondary posttraumatic, 48 patients, 139 implants, and 37 months; and acute trauma (internal orbit reconstruction), 50 patients, 64 implants, and 9 months. The distribution of implants according to location was as follows: frontal, 21; temporal, 30; internal orbit, 145; infraorbital rim, 28; malar, 58; paranasal, 29; nasal, 13; mandible, 24; and chin, 22. The combined average follow-up period per patient was 27 months (range, immediate postoperative period to 11 years). All implants were placed in the subperiosteal plane, and the majority were fixed with titanium screws. Antibiotics were administered perioperatively. No implants were extruded or migrated, formed clinically apparent capsules, or caused symptoms attributable to bioincompatibility. The overall reoperation rate was 10 percent (n = 16), which included operations to remove implants because of acute infections (2 percent, n = 3) or a late infection (1 percent, n = 1), to remove implants causing displeasing contours (2 percent, n = 3), and to improve contours (6 percent, n = 9). Porous polyethylene implants have biomaterial properties favorable for facial skeletal augmentation. Screw application of the implants to the skeleton allows precise predictable contouring, thus limiting the need for revisional surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711941     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000056866.80665.7A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  30 in total

1.  Review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Landon S Pryor; Earl Gage; Claude-Jean Langevin; Fernando Herrera; Andrew D Breithaupt; Chad R Gordon; Ahmed M Afifi; James E Zins; Hal Meltzer; Amanda Gosman; Steve R Cohen; Ralph Holmes
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

2.  Secondary infection affecting one of two simultaneously placed orbital wall implants.

Authors:  Sonya Babar; Nicholas T Iliff; Emily Macquaid
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-05

3.  Supraorbital Rim Contour Restoration with Porous Polyethylene Implant via Preexisting Scar.

Authors:  Yakup Cil; Muhitdin Eski
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-03

4.  Porous high-density polyethylene in functional rhinoplasty: Excellent long-term aesthetic results and safety.

Authors:  Young Hyo Kim; Tae Young Jang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 5.  A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  David Mok; Lucie Lessard; Carlos Cordoba; Patrick G Harris; Andreas Nikolis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

6.  [Tissue engineering using porous polyethylene implants].

Authors:  S Strieth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Craniofacial augmentation with porous polyethylene implants (Medpor: first clinical results].

Authors:  M Gosau; S Schiel; G F Draenert; S Ihrler; G Mast; M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-05

8.  Vascularized adipose tissue grafts from human mesenchymal stem cells with bioactive cues and microchannel conduits.

Authors:  Michael S Stosich; Barb Bastian; Nicholas W Marion; Paul A Clark; Gwendolen Reilly; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-12

9.  Long-term results of high-density porous polyethylene implants in facial skeletal augmentation: An Indian perspective.

Authors:  Sanjeev Deshpande; Amarnath Munoli
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-01

10.  The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation.

Authors:  Bryan C Mendelson; Steve R Jacobson; Alain M Lavoipierre; Richard J Huggins
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.