Literature DB >> 23467889

[Tissue engineering using porous polyethylene implants].

S Strieth1.   

Abstract

Although porous polyethylene (PPE) implants are already used in reconstructive craniofacial surgery, they are still only applied in rhinoplasty when critically indicated. Biocompatibility of PPE implants (pore size ~100-200 µm) can be modified by tissue engineering: coatings with extracellular matrix components, growth factors, anti-inflammatory substances and living cells are all possible. At present, transparent dorsal skinfold chamber models in animals appear to be particularly appropriate for pre-clinical evaluation. Using in vivo fluorescence microscopy, angiogenic microvascular ingrowth and inflammatory leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions can be analysed in detail with regard to functionally relevant mechanical integration. Preclinical data indicate that tissue engineering could improve the biocompatibility of these novel PPE implants and thus extend their range of clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23467889     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-012-2667-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  29 in total

Review 1.  Intravital fluorescence videomicroscopy to study tumor angiogenesis and microcirculation.

Authors:  P Vajkoczy; A Ullrich; M D Menger
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Vitalization of porous polyethylene (Medpor®) with chondrocytes promotes early implant vascularization and incorporation into the host tissue.

Authors:  Susanne Ehrmantraut; Andreas Naumann; Vivienne Willnecker; Stephanie Akinyemi; Christina Körbel; Claudia Scheuer; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg; Michael D Menger; Matthias W Laschke
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo.

Authors:  M W Laschke; J M Häufel; H Thorlacius; M D Menger
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Neovascularization of prosthetic vascular grafts. Quantitative analysis of angiogenesis and microhemodynamics by means of intravital microscopy.

Authors:  M D Menger; F Hammersen; P Walter; K Messmer
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes.

Authors:  Matthias W Laschke; Yves Harder; Michaela Amon; Ivan Martin; Jian Farhadi; Andrej Ring; Nestor Torio-Padron; René Schramm; Martin Rücker; Dominic Junker; Jörg M Häufel; Carlos Carvalho; Michael Heberer; Günter Germann; Brigitte Vollmar; Michael D Menger
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-08

6.  [Ear reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Effect of cortisone on edema reduction and healing process].

Authors:  A Naumann; S Ehrmantraut; V Willnecker; M D Menger; B Schick; M W Laschke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials.

Authors:  K Merritt; J W Shafer; S A Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1979-01

Review 9.  [Materials for reconstruction of the middle ear].

Authors:  G Geyer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Sonja Gratza; Sven Becker; Ilona Schwentner; Klaus Stelter; Martin Patscheider; Alexander Berghaus; John Martin Hempel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.