Literature DB >> 16685567

[Craniofacial augmentation with porous polyethylene implants (Medpor: first clinical results].

M Gosau1, S Schiel, G F Draenert, S Ihrler, G Mast, M Ehrenfeld.   

Abstract

SUBJECT: Porous polyethylene (Medpor) is an alloplastic material commonly used in craniofacial reconstruction. We report about our first clinical experiences with Medpor for facial augmentation procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 27 patients between 2001 and 2005 (11 female, 16 male) with 48 Medpor-implants. The indications for application of porous polyethylene implants in our clinic were congenital malformations (15), post-traumatic defects (10), and reconstructions after tumor resection (2). The implants were used for nasal/paranasal augmentations (16), for zygomatico-orbital augmentations (18), and for augmentations of the chin and malar region (11). The procedures were performed in a standardized manner. We used prefabricated, self-contoured implants and fixed them subperiosteally with titanium osteosynthesis screws. All operations were performed under general anesthesia. We evaluated the aesthetic results and the ingrowth behavior clinically and histologically.
RESULTS: We achieved good aesthetic results and the patients showed no signs of discomfort or rejection. Four patients required a second intervention. These revision surgeries included two cases of local infections and two for aesthetic contouring. The necessary reduction of the implants allowed the harvesting of tissue and implant samples for microscopy.
CONCLUSION: Porous polyethylene implants showed a good fibrovascular integration without encapsulation under the light microscope. Giant cells were detected on the surface of the implants. Besides this there was evidence for resorption of the implant material. Fixation with titanium screws is very effective. No implant dislocation or implant fracture occurred. The implants showed high volume stability and were easily handled and contoured. It is not possible to visualize Medpor implants with current imaging techniques, because polyethylene shows no contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16685567     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-006-0688-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  19 in total

1.  Mandibular augmentation.

Authors:  M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Early tissue infiltrate in porous polyethylene implants into bone: a scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M Spector; W R Flemming; B W Sauer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1975-09

3.  Comparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage grafts.

Authors:  Afsin Uysal; Serhat Ozbek; Mesut Ozcan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Biomaterials for reconstruction of the cranial vault.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Bio-compatibility in selection of materials for implantation.

Authors:  C A Homsy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1970-09

6.  Use of porous high-density polyethylene implants in temporal contour reconstruction.

Authors:  M Lacey; O Antonyshyn
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene.

Authors:  J J Klawitter; J G Bagwell; A M Weinstein; B W Sauer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1976-03

8.  Osteochondral reconstruction of a non-weight-bearing joint using a high-density porous polyethylene implant.

Authors:  J Weinzweig; M Pantaloni; A Spangenberger; J Marler; R J Zienowicz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants.

Authors:  Michael J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Six cases of bacterial infection in porous orbital implants.

Authors:  Jung-Ran You; Jin-Ho Seo; Yeong-Hoon Kim; Woong-Chul Choi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Ear reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Effect of cortisone on edema reduction and healing process].

Authors:  A Naumann; S Ehrmantraut; V Willnecker; M D Menger; B Schick; M W Laschke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Porous polyethylene implants for ear reconstruction of middle to high-grade ear defects].

Authors:  A Naumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures--complications, outcome, and review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Biomaterials in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

5.  Components of the plasminogen activation system promote engraftment of porous polyethylene biomaterial via common and distinct effects.

Authors:  Christoph A Reichel; Maximilian E T Hessenauer; Kerstin Pflieger; Markus Rehberg; Sandip M Kanse; Stefan Zahler; Fritz Krombach; Alexander Berghaus; Sebastian Strieth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.