Literature DB >> 12711585

Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: action as a sequence of chunks.

Stuart T Klapp1.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) prior to speech articulation increased as a function of response complexity. The RT findings formed 2 patterns, each of which was a different Response Complexity x Paradigm (choice RT vs. simple RT) interaction. That result extends previous findings from manual button-pressing tasks (S. T. Klapp, 1995) to a different action modality. Two different types of response programming, INT and SEQ, are assumed in the interpretation. Whereas INT can be identified with response programming within a word, SEQ fits a different interpretation related to timing of onsets of speech units. A critical assumption is that a long response is represented as a sequence of chunks; that organization is subject to manipulation. New findings suggest some modifications of the previous theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711585     DOI: 10.1080/00222890309602129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  29 in total

1.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Using the self-select paradigm to delineate the nature of speech motor programming.

Authors:  David L Wright; Don A Robin; Jooyhun Rhee; Amber Vaculin; Adam Jacks; Frank H Guenther; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

8.  Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Stuart T Klapp; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-31

9.  The effect of speaking rate on serial-order sound-level errors in normal healthy controls and persons with aphasia.

Authors:  Tepanta R D Fossett; Malcolm R McNeil; Sheila R Pratt; Connie A Tompkins; Linda I Shuster
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Neural recruitment for the production of native and novel speech sounds.

Authors:  Dana Moser; Julius Fridriksson; Leonardo Bonilha; Eric W Healy; Gordon Baylis; Julie M Baker; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.