Literature DB >> 23468160

Learning to recognize face shapes through serial exploration.

Christian Wallraven1, Lisa Whittingstall, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Human observers are experts at visual face recognition due to specialized visual mechanisms for face processing that evolve with perceptual expertize. Such expertize has long been attributed to the use of configural processing, enabled by fast, parallel information encoding of the visual information in the face. Here we tested whether participants can learn to efficiently recognize faces that are serially encoded-that is, when only partial visual information about the face is available at any given time. For this, ten participants were trained in gaze-restricted face recognition in which face masks were viewed through a small aperture controlled by the participant. Tests comparing trained with untrained performance revealed (1) a marked improvement in terms of speed and accuracy, (2) a gradual development of configural processing strategies, and (3) participants' ability to rapidly learn and accurately recognize novel exemplars. This performance pattern demonstrates that participants were able to learn new strategies to compensate for the serial nature of information encoding. The results are discussed in terms of expertize acquisition and relevance for other sensory modalities relying on serial encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23468160     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3463-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  B de Gelder; R Rouw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

3.  Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?

Authors:  Rachel Robbins; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-05

4.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing.

Authors:  Lisa S Scott; James W Tanaka; David L Sheinberg; Tim Curran
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.

Authors:  Luc Boutsen; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Observation of own exploration movements impairs haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Stephanie Mueller; Stefanie Habermann; Janett Dudda; Martin Grunwald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.

Authors:  Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.