Literature DB >> 12699310

Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent.

Kao-Ping Chua1, Marvin M Chun.   

Abstract

When novel scenes are encoded, the representations of scene layout are generally viewpoint specific. Past studies of scene recognition have typically required subjects to explicitly study and encode novel scenes, but in everyday visual experience, it is possible that much scene learning occurs incidentally. Here, we examine whether implicitly encoded scene layouts are also viewpoint dependent. We used the contextual cuing paradigm, in which search for a target is facilitated by implicitly learned associations between target locations and novel spatial contexts (Chun & Jiang, 1998). This task was extended to naturalistic search arrays with apparent depth. To test viewpoint dependence, the viewpoint of the scenes was varied from training to testing. Contextual cuing and, hence, scene context learning decreased as the angular rotation from training viewpoint increased. This finding suggests that implicitly acquired representations of scene layout are viewpoint dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699310     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes.

Authors:  Markus Conci; Luning Sun; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-20

2.  Extrapolating spatial layout in scene representations.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

3.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

4.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

5.  Use of spatial context is restricted by relative position in implicit learning.

Authors:  Nobutaka Endo; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Misleading contextual cues: how do they affect visual search?

Authors:  Angela A Manginelli; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

7.  How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing.

Authors:  Justin A Jungé; Brian J Scholl; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2007

8.  Visual working memory for global, object, and part-based information.

Authors:  Michael D Patterson; Benjamin Martin Bly; Anthony J Porcelli; Bart Rypma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

Review 9.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Location matters: why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks.

Authors:  Glenn Gunzelmann; John R Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.