Literature DB >> 12687883

Coronary sinus lead extraction.

G Frank O Tyers1, Jacquie Clark, Yan Wang, Pauline Mills, Jamil Bashir.   

Abstract

Complications are reported more frequently with the implantation of coronary sinus (CS) than other types of leads, and attempts to extract CS leads may also be associated with increased risks. The authors have performed nonthoracotomy lead extraction (LE) since 1981 and maintained a detailed database. By November 2001, 796 leads had been removed from 401 patients. We undertook review of our CS-LE experience to evaluate prevalence, safety, and efficacy. Of 14 patients referred for CS-LE, 7 were treated in the last year. In six the lead had been placed in the CS intentionally, and in eight inadvertently. One recent patient treated with biventricular pacing was septic and died before LE was undertaken. In nine men and four women (mean age 66 years) had one each CS lead and a total of 34 LEs (2.6/patient). Four CS leads had been in place for < 6 months (mean 1.5 month), whereas nine had been in place for between 6 months and 27 years. Several LE methods were used, from simple traction to the use of intraluminal locking stylets and powered sheaths. Complete removal of all leads was achieved in all patients. CS-LE required a mean of 13 minutes, including 1.8 minutes of fluoroscopy. There were no serious complications during the procedures, and the mean hospital stay was 4 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687883     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  [Left ventricular pacing and CRT. What CV lead fits into which vein?].

Authors:  B Hansky; J Vogt; H Gueldner; J Heintze; B Lamp; D Horstkotte; R Koerfer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2006

3.  Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.

Authors:  Seth Sheldon; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Michael J Osborn; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Extraction of implantable cardiac electronic devices.

Authors:  John Rickard; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Safety and feasibility of coronary sinus left ventricular leads extraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Martino; Serafino Orazi; Giovanni Bisignani; Salvatore Toscano; Loredana Messano; Quintino Parisi; Matteo Santamaria; Gemma Pelargonio; Antonio Dello Russo; Fulvio Bellocci; Paolo Zecchi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Advances in devices for cardiac resynchronization in heart failure.

Authors:  Chu-Pak Lau; Serge Barold; Hung-Fat Tse; Kathy Lai-Fun Lee; Hon-Wah Chan; Katherine Fan; Elaine Chau; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.