Literature DB >> 27162569

Review of Maxillofacial Hardware Complications and Indications for Salvage.

Jonatan Hernandez Rosa1, Nathaniel L Villanueva2, Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy1, Stephanie H Factor3, Peter J Taub1.   

Abstract

From 2002 to 2006, more than 117,000 facial fractures were recorded in the U.S. National Trauma Database. These fractures are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation. While in place, the hardware facilitates successful bony union. However, when postoperative complications occur, the plates may require removal before bony union. Indications for salvage versus removal of the maxillofacial hardware are not well defined. A literature review was performed to identify instances when hardware may be salvaged. Articles considered for inclusion were found in the PubMed and Web of Science databases in August 2014 with the keywords maxillofacial trauma AND hardware complications OR indications for hardware removal. Included studies looked at human patients with only facial trauma and miniplate fixation, and presented data on complications and/or hardware removal. Fifteen articles were included. None were clinical trials. Complication data were presented by patient, fractures, and/or plate without consistency. The data described 1,075 fractures, 2,961 patients, and 2,592 plates, nonexclusive. Complication rates varied from 6 to 8% by fracture and 6 to 13% by patient. When their data were combined, 50% of complications were treated with plate removal; this was consistent across the mandible, midface, and upper face. All complications caused by loosening, nonunion, broken hardware, and severe/prolonged pain were treated with removal. Some complications caused by exposures, deformities, and infections were treated with salvage. Exposed plates were treated with flaps, plates with deformities were treated with secondary procedures including hardware revision, and hardware infections were treated with antibiotics alone or in conjunction with soft-tissue debridement and/or tooth extraction. Well-designed clinical trials evaluating hardware removal versus salvage are lacking. Some postoperative complications caused by exposure, deformity, and/or infection may be successfully treated with plate salvage. We propose an algorithm using this review and clinical expertise. We also propose that a national databank be created where surgeons can uniformly compile their patient information and examine it in a standardized format to further our understanding of clinical management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; hardware; maxillofacial; salvage

Year:  2015        PMID: 27162569      PMCID: PMC4858429          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  19 in total

1.  Miniplate removal in trauma and orthognathic surgery--a retrospective study.

Authors:  M R Mosbah; D Oloyede; D A Koppel; K F Moos; D Stenhouse
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Removal of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures.

Authors:  B Alpert; D Seligson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.

Authors:  David Kirkpatrick; Rahul Gandhi; Joseph E Van Sickels
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Two hundred ninety-four consecutive facial fractures in an urban trauma center: lessons learned.

Authors:  Patrick Kelley; Marcus Crawford; Stephen Higuera; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Complication rates associated with different treatments for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  J C Moreno; A Fernández; J A Ortiz; J J Montalvo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Complications and removal rates of miniplates and screws used for maxillofacial fractures.

Authors:  Kemal Islamoglu; O Koray Coskunfirat; Gulsum Tetik; H Ege Ozgentas
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Removal of miniplates in maxillofacial surgery: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Vyomesh Bhatt; Purnima Chhabra; M S Dover
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Factors associated with long-term complications after repair of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Marie Furr; John M Schweinfurth; Warren L May
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Rigid internal fixation of infected mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Emily Van Heukelom; David A Cottrell
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Removal of bone plates in patients with maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdulaziz A Bakathir; Manjunath V Margasahayam; Mohammed I Al-Ismaily
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-03-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Gareb; N B van Bakelen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B van Minnen; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Complications of Poly-l-Lactic Acid and Polyglycolic Acid (PLLA/PGA) Osteosynthesis Systems for Maxillofacial Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Investigation.

Authors:  Yuhei Matsuda; Masaaki Karino; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  In Silico Biomechanical Evaluation of WE43 Magnesium Plates for Mandibular Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Vincenzo Orassi; Heilwig Fischer; Georg N Duda; Max Heiland; Sara Checa; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Biodegradable Zn-Cu-Fe Alloy as a Promising Material for Craniomaxillofacial Implants: An in vitro Investigation into Degradation Behavior, Cytotoxicity, and Hemocompatibility.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Yichen Xu; Wentai Zhang; Ming Li; Hans-Peter Wendel; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Ping Li; Guojiang Wan; Shulan Xu; Tao Hu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.545

5.  Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chithra Aramanadka; Abhay T Kamath; G Srikanth; Deepika Pai; Nishu Singla; Shriya Daundiyal; Avani Desai
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-06-23

6.  Miniplate removal in operated cases of maxillofacial region in a dental institute in Rajasthan, India.

Authors:  Pulkit Khandelwal; A Bhagavandas Rai; Bipin Bulgannawar; Nilay Vakaria; Hemal Sejani; Neha Hajira
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of 3D-printed nickel-titanium fabricated by selective laser melting.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Ali Ihsan Gökkaya; Yahya Açil; Klaas Loger; Tim Klüter; Sabine Fuchs; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.