Literature DB >> 12675370

Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection.

Mark W Blows1, Megan Higgie.   

Abstract

Field populations of Drosophila serrata display reproductive character displacement in cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) when sympatric with Drosophila birchii. We have previously shown that the naturally occurring pattern of reproductive character displacement can be experimentally replicated by exposing field allopatric populations of D. serrata to experimental sympatry with D. birchii. Here, we tested whether the repeated evolution of reproductive character displacement in natural and experimental populations was a consequence of genetic constraints on the evolution of CHCs. The genetic variance-covariance (G) matrices for CHCs were determined for populations of D. serrata that had evolved in either the presence or absence of D. birchii under field and experimental conditions. Natural selection on mate recognition under both field and experimental sympatric conditions increased the genetic variance in CHCs consistent with a response to selection based on rare alleles. A close association between G eigenstructure and the eigenstructure of the phenotypic divergence (D) matrix in natural and experimental populations suggested that G matrix eigenstructure may have determined the direction in which reproductive character displacement evolved during the reinforcement of mate recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675370     DOI: 10.1086/345783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  19 in total

1.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology.

Authors:  Charles C Roseman; Katherine E Willmore; Jeffrey Rogers; Charles Hildebolt; Brooke E Sadler; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations.

Authors:  J D Aguirre; E Hine; K McGuigan; M W Blows
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Directional selection effects on patterns of phenotypic (co)variation in wild populations.

Authors:  A P A Assis; J L Patton; A Hubbe; G Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforest Drosophila and European butterflies.

Authors:  Eleanor K O'Brien; Greg M Walter; Jon Bridle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Cryptic evolution: does environmental deterioration have a genetic basis?

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield; Alastair J Wilson; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.