Literature DB >> 35184592

Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforest Drosophila and European butterflies.

Eleanor K O'Brien1,2, Greg M Walter3, Jon Bridle1,4.   

Abstract

Models of local adaptation to spatially varying selection predict that maximum rates of evolution are determined by the interaction between increased adaptive potential owing to increased genetic variation, and the cost genetic variation brings by reducing population fitness. We discuss existing and new results from our laboratory assays and field transplants of rainforest Drosophila and UK butterflies along environmental gradients, which try to test these predictions in natural populations. Our data suggest that: (i) local adaptation along ecological gradients is not consistently observed in time and space, especially where biotic and abiotic interactions affect both gradient steepness and genetic variation in fitness; (ii) genetic variation in fitness observed in the laboratory is only sometimes visible to selection in the field, suggesting that demographic costs can remain high without increasing adaptive potential; and (iii) antagonistic interactions between species reduce local productivity, especially at ecological margins. Such antagonistic interactions steepen gradients and may increase the cost of adaptation by increasing its dimensionality. However, where biotic interactions do evolve, rapid range expansion can follow. Future research should test how the environmental sensitivity of genotypes determines their ecological exposure, and its effects on genetic variation in fitness, to predict the probability of evolutionary rescue at ecological margins. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (Part II)'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  field transplants; genetic load; local adaptation; phenotypic plasticity; range margins; species interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35184592      PMCID: PMC8859522          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  58 in total

1.  Temperature-dependent alterations in host use drive rapid range expansion in a butterfly.

Authors:  Rachel M Pateman; Jane K Hill; David B Roy; Richard Fox; Chris D Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?

Authors:  Jon R Bridle; Timothy H Vines
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Habitat choice meets thermal specialization: Competition with specialists may drive suboptimal habitat preferences in generalists.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Estelle Laurent; Bart Haegeman; Romain Bertrand; Jérôme G Prunier; Delphine Legrand; Julien Cote; Alexis S Chaine; Michel Loreau; Jean Clobert; Nicolas Schtickzelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gene flow favours local adaptation under habitat choice in ciliate microcosms.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Delphine Legrand; Alexis S Chaine; Dries Bonte; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Michèle Huet; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  THE GENETICS OF CENTRAL AND MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA SERRATA. I. GENETIC VARIATION FOR STRESS RESISTANCE AND SPECIES BORDERS.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Local adaptation stops where ecological gradients steepen or are interrupted.

Authors:  Jon R Bridle; Masakado Kawata; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  In search of a general theory of species' range evolution.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Male fertility thermal limits predict vulnerability to climate warming.

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Microclimate and resource quality determine resource use in a range-expanding herbivore.

Authors:  James E Stewart; Ilya M D Maclean; Alice J Edney; Jon Bridle; Robert J Wilson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.812

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding the biology of species' ranges: when and how does evolution change the rules of ecological engagement?

Authors:  Jon Bridle; Ary Hoffmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.