Literature DB >> 12672595

Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens.

Hanne Rosenquist1, Niels L Nielsen, Helle M Sommer, Birgit Nørrung, Bjarke B Christensen.   

Abstract

A quantitative risk assessment comprising the elements hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization has been prepared to assess the effect of different mitigation strategies on the number of human cases in Denmark associated with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in chickens. To estimate the human exposure to Campylobacter from a chicken meal and the number of human cases associated with this exposure, a mathematical risk model was developed. The model details the spread and transfer of Campylobacter in chickens from slaughter to consumption and the relationship between ingested dose and the probability of developing campylobacteriosis. Human exposure was estimated in two successive mathematical modules. Module 1 addresses changes in prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on chicken carcasses throughout the processing steps of a slaughterhouse. Module 2 covers the transfer of Campylobacter during food handling in private kitchens. The age and sex of consumers were included in this module to introduce variable hygiene levels during food preparation and variable sizes and compositions of meals. Finally, the outcome of the exposure assessment modules was integrated with a Beta-Poisson dose-response model to provide a risk estimate. Simulations designed to predict the effect of different mitigation strategies showed that the incidence of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of chicken meals could be reduced 30 times by introducing a 2 log reduction of the number of Campylobacter on the chicken carcasses. To obtain a similar reduction of the incidence, the flock prevalence should be reduced approximately 30 times or the kitchen hygiene improved approximately 30 times. Cross-contamination from positive to negative flocks during slaughter had almost no effect on the human Campylobacter incidence, which indicates that implementation of logistic slaughter will only have a minor influence on the risk. Finally, the simulations showed that people in the age of 18-29 years had the highest risk of developing campylobacteriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672595     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00317-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  76 in total

1.  Effects of polyphosphate additives on Campylobacter survival in processed chicken exudates.

Authors:  Nereus W Gunther
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sources of Campylobacter spp. colonizing housed broiler flocks during rearing.

Authors:  S A Bull; V M Allen; G Domingue; F Jørgensen; J A Frost; R Ure; R Whyte; D Tinker; J E L Corry; J Gillard-King; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Quantification of campylobacter species cross-contamination during handling of contaminated fresh chicken parts in kitchens.

Authors:  Petra Luber; Sigrid Brynestad; Daniela Topsch; Kathrin Scherer; Edda Bartelt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Novel approaches for Campylobacter control in poultry.

Authors:  Jun Lin
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.171

5.  Baseline data from a Belgium-wide survey of Campylobacter species contamination in chicken meat preparations and considerations for a reliable monitoring program.

Authors:  Ihab Habib; Imca Sampers; Mieke Uyttendaele; Dirk Berkvens; Lieven De Zutter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Broiler Campylobacter contamination and human campylobacteriosis in Iceland.

Authors:  Kenneth A Callicott; Hjördís Harğardóttir; Franklín Georgsson; Jarle Reiersen; Vala Friğriksdóttir; Eggert Gunnarsson; Pascal Michel; Jean-Robert Bisaillon; Karl G Kristinsson; Haraldur Briem; Kelli L Hiett; David S Needleman; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  A multi-centre prospective case-control study of campylobacter infection in persons aged 5 years and older in Australia.

Authors:  Cameron Moffatt
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Molecular tracking, through processing, of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Victoria K Morris; Diane G Newell; Vivien M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Phage Biocontrol of Campylobacter: A One Health Approach.

Authors:  Sophie Kittler; Severin Steffan; Elisa Peh; Madeleine Plötz
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  The in vivo efficacy of two administration routes of a phage cocktail to reduce numbers of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni in chickens.

Authors:  Carla M Carvalho; Ben W Gannon; Deborah E Halfhide; Silvio B Santos; Christine M Hayes; John M Roe; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.