Literature DB >> 16391102

Sources of Campylobacter spp. colonizing housed broiler flocks during rearing.

S A Bull1, V M Allen, G Domingue, F Jørgensen, J A Frost, R Ure, R Whyte, D Tinker, J E L Corry, J Gillard-King, T J Humphrey.   

Abstract

The study aimed to identify sources of campylobacter in 10 housed broiler flocks from three United Kingdom poultry companies. Samples from (i) the breeder flocks, which supplied the broilers, (ii) cleaned and disinfected houses prior to chick placement, (iii) the chickens, and (iv) the environments inside and outside the broiler houses during rearing were examined. Samples were collected at frequent intervals and examined for Campylobacter spp. Characterization of the isolates using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), serotyping, phage typing, and flaA restriction fragment length polymorphism typing was performed. Seven flocks became colonized during the growing period. Campylobacter spp. were detected in the environment surrounding the broiler house, prior to as well as during flock colonization, for six of these flocks. On two occasions, isolates detected in a puddle just prior to the birds being placed were indistinguishable from those colonizing the birds. Once flocks were colonized, indistinguishable strains of campylobacter were found in the feed and water and in the air of the broiler house. Campylobacter spp. were also detected in the air up to 30 m downstream of the broiler house, which raises the issue of the role of airborne transmission in the spread of campylobacter. At any time during rearing, broiler flocks were colonized by only one or two types determined by MLST but these changed, with some strains superseding others. In conclusion, the study provided strong evidence for the environment as a source of campylobacters colonizing housed broiler flocks. It also demonstrated colonization by successive campylobacter types determined by MLST during the life of a flock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391102      PMCID: PMC1352183          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.645-652.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  A trial of biosecurity as a means to control Campylobacter infection of broiler chickens.

Authors:  J C Gibbens; S J Pascoe; S J Evans; R H Davies; A R Sayers
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Distribution of Campylobacter spp. in selected U.S. poultry production and processing operations.

Authors:  N J Stern; P Fedorka-Cray; J S Bailey; N A Cox; S E Craven; K L Hiett; M T Musgrove; S Ladely; D Cosby; G C Mead
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.077

3.  Impact of transport crate reuse and of catching and processing on Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination of broiler chickens.

Authors:  J Slader; G Domingue; F Jørgensen; K McAlpine; R J Owen; F J Bolton; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organisms.

Authors:  J E Corry; H I Atabay
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001

5.  Inhibition of colonisation of the alimentary tract in young chickens with Campylobacter jejuni by pre-colonisation with strains of C. jejuni.

Authors:  P A Barrow; K Page
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Evidence that certain clones of Campylobacter jejuni persist during successive broiler flock rotations.

Authors:  L Petersen; A Wedderkopp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Changes in the carriage of Campylobacter strains by poultry carcasses during processing in abattoirs.

Authors:  D G Newell; J E Shreeve; M Toszeghy; G Domingue; S Bull; T Humphrey; G Mead
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Prevalence, antigenic specificity, and bactericidal activity of poultry anti-Campylobacter maternal antibodies.

Authors:  O Sahin; Q Zhang; J C Meitzler; B S Harr; T Y Morishita; R Mohan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Epidemiologic features of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry broiler houses and surrounding environments as determined by use of molecular strain typing.

Authors:  E G Nesbit; P Gibbs; D W Dreesen; M D Lee
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Phage typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and its use as an adjunct to serotyping.

Authors:  J A Frost; J M Kramer; S A Gillanders
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.451

View more
  71 in total

Review 1.  Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

Authors:  D G Newell; K T Elvers; D Dopfer; I Hansson; P Jones; S James; J Gittins; N J Stern; R Davies; I Connerton; D Pearson; G Salvat; V M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Longitudinal molecular epidemiological study of thermophilic campylobacters on one conventional broiler chicken farm.

Authors:  Anne M Ridley; Victoria K Morris; Shaun A Cawthraw; Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Jillian A Harris; Emma M Kennedy; Diane G Newell; Vivien M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Flock health indicators and Campylobacter spp. in commercial housed broilers reared in Great Britain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Bull; Alastair Thomas; Thomas Humphrey; Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Alasdair J Cook; Roger Lovell; Frieda Jorgensen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The prevalence of Campylobacter species in broiler flocks and their environment: assessing the efficiency of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for adopting control strategy.

Authors:  Asmaa Nady Mohammed; Sahar Abdel Aleem Abdel Aziz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Real-time PCR approach for detection of environmental sources of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Authors:  Anne M Ridley; Vivien M Allen; Meenaxi Sharma; Jill A Harris; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: prevalence, concentration shed, and host association.

Authors:  Iain D Ogden; John F Dallas; Marion MacRae; Ovidiu Rotariu; Kenny W Reay; Malcolm Leitch; Ann P Thomson; Samuel K Sheppard; Martin Maiden; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.171

9.  Development of a strain-specific molecular method for quantitating individual campylobacter strains in mixed populations.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Christopher R Helps; Trudy M Wassenaar; Vivien M Allen; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Campylobacter infection of broiler chickens in a free-range environment.

Authors:  Frances M Colles; Tracey A Jones; Noel D McCarthy; Samuel K Sheppard; Alison J Cody; Kate E Dingle; Marian S Dawkins; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.