Literature DB >> 21705532

Molecular tracking, through processing, of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Karen T Elvers1, Victoria K Morris, Diane G Newell, Vivien M Allen.   

Abstract

Many of the poultry flocks produced in the United Kingdom are colonized with Campylobacter, and the intensive nature of poultry processing usually results in contaminated carcasses. In this study, a previously reported molecular oligonucleotide probe method was used to track a specific flock-colonizing strain(s) on broiler carcasses during processing in two United Kingdom commercial poultry processing plants. Five Campylobacter-positive flocks were sampled at four points along the processing line, postbleed, postpluck, prechill, and postchill, and two Campylobacter-negative flocks processed immediately after positive flocks were sampled prechill. flaA was sequenced from Campylobacter strains isolated from these flocks, and strain-specific probes were synthesized. Skin and cecal samples were plated onto selective agar to give individual colonies, which were transferred onto membranes. These were then hybridized with the strain- and genus-specific probes. For all the 5 positive flocks, there was a significant reduction in campylobacters postbleed compared to postpluck but no subsequent fall on sampling pre- and postchill, and the strain(s) predominating on the carcasses throughout processing came from the flock being processed. This indicates that strains from the abattoir environment were not a significant cause of carcass contamination in flocks with well-established campylobacter colonization. However, negative flocks that were preceded by positive flocks were contaminated by strains that did not generally originate from the predominating strains recovered from the ceca of the previous positive flocks. This suggests that the abattoir environment has a significant role in the contamination of carcasses from negative but not fully colonized flocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21705532      PMCID: PMC3165246          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02419-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

1.  Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in broiler feces and in corresponding processed carcasses.

Authors:  N J Stern; M C Robach
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Predicted quantitative effect of logistic slaughter on microbial prevalence.

Authors:  Eric G Evers
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Campylobacter contamination during poultry slaughter in Belgium.

Authors:  G Rasschaert; K Houf; J Van Hende; L De Zutter
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Genomic diversity of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni isolates recovered from free-range broiler farms and comparison with isolates of various origins.

Authors:  K Rivoal; C Ragimbeau; G Salvat; P Colin; G Ermel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Relationship between aerobic bacteria, salmonellae and Campylobacter on broiler carcasses.

Authors:  J A Cason; J S Bailey; N J Stern; A D Whittemore; N A Cox
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens.

Authors:  Hanne Rosenquist; Niels L Nielsen; Helle M Sommer; Birgit Nørrung; Bjarke B Christensen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-05-25       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Molecular subtype analyses of Campylobacter spp. from Arkansas and California poultry operations.

Authors:  K L Hiett; N J Stern; P Fedorka-Cray; N A Cox; M T Musgrove; S Ladely
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Distribution and numbers of Campylobacter in newly slaughtered broiler chickens and hens.

Authors:  E Berndtson; M Tivemo; A Engvall
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  The effect of slaughter operations on the contamination of chicken carcasses with thermotolerant Campylobacter.

Authors:  Hanne Rosenquist; Helle M Sommer; Niels L Nielsen; Bjarke B Christensen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Routes for Campylobacter contamination of poultry meat: epidemiological study from hatchery to slaughterhouse.

Authors:  L Herman; M Heyndrickx; K Grijspeerdt; D Vandekerchove; I Rollier; L De Zutter
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.451

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of genotypes and antibiotic resistances of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on chicken retail meat and at slaughter.

Authors:  Sonja Kittl; Bożena M Korczak; Lilian Niederer; Andreas Baumgartner; Sabina Buettner; Gudrun Overesch; Peter Kuhnert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enhancement of bactericidal effects of sodium hypochlorite in chiller water with food additive grade calcium hydroxide.

Authors:  Chiharu Toyofuku; Md Shahin Alam; Masashi Yamada; Miyuki Komura; Mayuko Suzuki; Hakimullah Hakim; Natthanan Sangsriratanakul; Dany Shoham; Kazuaki Takehara
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Wide but Variable Distribution of a Hypervirulent Campylobacter jejuni Clone in Beef and Dairy Cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Yizhi Tang; Richard J Meinersmann; Orhan Sahin; Zuowei Wu; Lei Dai; James Carlson; Jodie Plumblee Lawrence; Linda Genzlinger; Jeffrey T LeJeune; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Human Campylobacteriosis Cases Traceable to Chicken Meat-Evidence for Disseminated Outbreaks in Finland.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Llarena; Rauni Kivistö
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-10-22

Review 5.  Application of Bacteriophages to Limit Campylobacter in Poultry Production.

Authors:  Elena G Olson; Andrew C Micciche; Michael J Rothrock; Yichao Yang; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.