Literature DB >> 12665991

Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum.

M Lugli1, H Y Yan, M L Fine.   

Abstract

Two freshwater gobies Padogobius martensii and Gobius nigricans live in shallow (5-70 cm) stony streams, and males of both species produce courtship sounds. A previous study demonstrated high noise levels near waterfalls, a quiet window in the noise around 100 Hz at noisy locations, and extremely short-range propagation of noise and goby signals. To investigate the relationship of this acoustic environment to communication, we determined audiograms for both species and measured parameters of courtship sounds produced in the streams. We also deflated the swimbladder in P. martensii to determine its effect on frequency utilization in sound production and hearing. Both species are maximally sensitive at 100 Hz and produce low-frequency sounds with main energy from 70 to 100-150 Hz. Swimbladder deflation does not affect auditory threshold or dominant frequency of courtship sounds and has no or minor effects on sound amplitude. Therefore, both species utilize frequencies for hearing and sound production that fall within the low-frequency quiet region, and the equivalent relationship between auditory sensitivity and maximum ambient noise levels in both species further suggests that ambient noise shapes hearing sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12665991     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0404-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Did auditory sensitivity and vocalization evolve independently in otophysan fishes?

Authors:  F Ladich
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Auditory role of the suprabranchial chamber in gourami fish.

Authors:  H Y Yan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Effects of low-frequency underwater sound on hair cells of the inner ear and lateral line of the teleost fish Astronotus ocellatus.

Authors:  M C Hastings; A N Popper; J J Finneran; P J Lanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Variability in the role of the gasbladder in fish audition.

Authors:  H Y Yan; M L Fine; N S Horn; W E Colón
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Acoustic communication in an electric fish, Pollimyrus isidori (Mormyridae).

Authors:  J D Crawford; M Hagedorn; C D Hopkins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish.

Authors:  A R Scholik; H Y Yan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Movement and sound generation by the toadfish swimbladder.

Authors:  M L Fine; K L Malloy; C B King; S L Mitchell; T M Cameron
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Shallow-water propagation of the toadfish mating call.

Authors:  M L Fine; M L Lenhardt
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1983

9.  Correlation between auditory sensitivity and vocalization in anabantoid fishes.

Authors:  F Ladich; H Y Yan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Sound Production by Cichlid Fishes.

Authors:  A A Myrberg; E Kramer; P Heinecke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Year-round variability of ambient noise in temperate freshwater habitats and its implications for fishes.

Authors:  Sonja Amoser; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Aquat Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise.

Authors:  Marco Lugli
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Modulation of auditory signal-to-noise ratios by efferent stimulation.

Authors:  Seth M Tomchik; Zhongmin Lu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence for hearing loss in amblyopsid cavefishes.

Authors:  Matthew L Niemiller; Dennis M Higgs; Daphne Soares
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Correlation between acoustic divergence and phylogenetic distance in soniferous European gobiids (Gobiidae; Gobius lineage).

Authors:  Sven Horvatić; Stefano Malavasi; Jasna Vukić; Radek Šanda; Zoran Marčić; Marko Ćaleta; Massimo Lorenzoni; Perica Mustafić; Ivana Buj; Lucija Onorato; Lucija Ivić; Francesco Cavraro; Davor Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hearing in cichlid fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Tanja Schulz-Mirbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relationship between swim bladder morphology and hearing abilities--a case study on Asian and African cichlids.

Authors:  Tanja Schulz-Mirbach; Brian Metscher; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  The relationship between acoustic habitat, hearing and tonal vocalizations in the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus, Linnaeus, 1758).

Authors:  Mario Rivera Chavarría; Jorge Castro; Arturo Camacho
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.