Literature DB >> 9631554

Correlation between auditory sensitivity and vocalization in anabantoid fishes.

F Ladich1, H Y Yan.   

Abstract

Several anabantoid species produce broadband sounds with high-pitched dominant frequencies (0.8-2.5 kHz), which contrast with generally low-frequency hearing abilities in (perciform) fishes. Utilizing a recently developed auditory brainstem response recording-technique, auditory sensitivities of the gouramis Trichopsis vittata, T. pumila, Colisa lalia, Macropodus opercularis and Trichogaster trichopterus were investigated and compared with the sound characteristics of the respective species. All five species exhibited enhanced sound-detecting abilities and perceived tone bursts up to 5 kHz, which qualifies this group as hearing specialists. All fishes possessed a high-frequency sensitivity maximum between 800 Hz and 1500 Hz. Lowest hearing thresholds were found in T. trichopterus (76 dB re I microPa at 800 Hz). Dominant frequencies of sounds correspond with the best hearing bandwidth in T. vittata (1-2 kHz) and C. lalia (0.8-1 kHz). In the smallest species, T. pumila, dominant frequencies of acoustic signals (1.5-2.5 kHz) do not match lowest thresholds, which were below 1.5 kHz. However, of all species studied, T. pumila had best hearing sensitivity at frequencies above 2 kHz. The association between high-pitched sounds and hearing may be caused by the suprabranchial airbreathing chamber, which, lying close to the hearing and sonic organs, enhances both sound perception and emission at its resonant frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9631554     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory saccular sensitivity of the vocal Lusitanian toadfish: low frequency tuning allows acoustic communication throughout the year.

Authors:  Raquel O Vasconcelos; Joseph A Sisneros; M Clara P Amorim; Paulo J Fonseca
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum.

Authors:  M Lugli; H Y Yan; M L Fine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Acoustic communication and the evolution of hearing in fishes.

Authors:  F Ladich
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Ontogenetic development of auditory sensitivity and sound production in the squeaker catfish Synodontis schoutedeni.

Authors:  Walter Lechner; Lidia Eva Wysocki; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Representation of complex vocalizations in the Lusitanian toadfish auditory system: evidence of fine temporal, frequency and amplitude discrimination.

Authors:  Raquel O Vasconcelos; Paulo J Fonseca; M Clara P Amorim; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Noise in the Sea and Its Impacts on Marine Organisms.

Authors:  Chao Peng; Xinguo Zhao; Guangxu Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Sex-specific differences in agonistic behaviour, sound production and auditory sensitivity in the callichthyid armoured catfish Megalechis thoracata.

Authors:  Oliwia Hadjiaghai; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frog.

Authors:  Longhui Zhao; Jichao Wang; Yue Yang; Bicheng Zhu; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Richard R Fay
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.