Literature DB >> 20443010

Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise.

Marco Lugli1.   

Abstract

The habitat ambient noise may exert an important selective pressure on frequencies used in acoustic communication by animals. A previous study demonstrated the presence of a match between the low-frequency quiet region of the stream ambient noise (termed 'quiet window') and the main frequencies used for sound production and hearing by two stream gobies (Padogobius bonelli, Gobius nigricans). The present study examines the spectral features of ambient noise in very shallow freshwater, brackish and marine habitats and correlates them to the range of dominant frequencies of sounds used by nine species of Mediterranean gobies reproducing in these environments. Ambient noise spectra of these habitats featured a low-frequency quiet window centered at 100 Hz (stream, sandy/rocky sea shore), or at 200 Hz (spring, brackish lagoon). The analysis of the ambient noise/sound spectrum relationships showed the sound frequencies matched the frequency band of the quiet window in the ambient noise typical of their own habitat. Analogous ambient noise/sound frequency relationships were observed in other shallow-water teleosts living in similar underwater environments. Conclusions may be relevant to the understanding of evolution of fish acoustic communication and hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443010     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0528-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Margriet Peet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Albert S Feng; Wenyu Lin; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger; Roderick A Suthers; Chunhe Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats?

Authors:  Sonja Amoser; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Diversity in ambient noise in European freshwater habitats: noise levels, spectral profiles, and impact on fishes.

Authors:  Lidia Eva Wysocki; Sonja Amoser; Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum.

Authors:  M Lugli; H Y Yan; M L Fine
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Seasonal and geographical variation of the mating call of the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau L.

Authors:  Michael L Fine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: ambient noise and short-range propagation in shallow streams.

Authors:  M Lugli; M L Fine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Shallow-water propagation of the toadfish mating call.

Authors:  M L Fine; M L Lenhardt
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1983

9.  Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks.

Authors:  Tomonari Akamatsu; Tsuyoshi Okumura; Nicola Novarini; Hong Y Yan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  The importance of ambient sound level to characterise anuran habitat.

Authors:  Sandra Goutte; Alain Dubois; Frédéric Legendre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Ecology of sound communication in fishes.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich
Journal:  Fish Fish (Oxf)       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.218

3.  Hearing in cichlid fishes under noise conditions.

Authors:  Friedrich Ladich; Tanja Schulz-Mirbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Anthropogenic sources of underwater sound can modify how sediment-dwelling invertebrates mediate ecosystem properties.

Authors:  Martin Solan; Chris Hauton; Jasmin A Godbold; Christina L Wood; Timothy G Leighton; Paul White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Temperate freshwater soundscapes: A cacophony of undescribed biological sounds now threatened by anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Rodney A Rountree; Francis Juanes; Marta Bolgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.